Monday, June 8 | 1:00 a.m.
In addressing the pros and cons about a replacement bridge, I remember that many years ago a new bridge was constructed to give us the present configuration of the Interstate 5 Bridge. It was made a toll bridge for a number of years. Voila! The bridge was paid for and then no more tolls. Lesson learned is that tourists and commercial vehicles from around the USA and yes, locally, paid a tremendous share of the cost.
In my travels, I crossed a new bridge over the San Francisco bay at Martinez, Calif. It cost $8 because of the length of our motor home with a tow car. That's money toward the payment of construction by just one visitor. So having toll fees to help pay for the I-5 bridge is not unrealistic. My aunt, who lived in Vancouver, owned a business in the Hollywood district in Portland and crossed the Interstate 5 Bridge twice daily on her commute for years. She paid the toll and wasn't financially overwhelmed.
Also, what's wrong with designing an aesthetically beautiful and functional span? We saw some pretty impressive bridges in China and Japan and I understand that France has a new bridge of note that draws travelers to visit.
Betty Carson
Vancouver
This is in response to Martha Lane's rant in a May 30 letter, "Stop listening to party's blowhards," about Rush Limbaugh, and to anyone else feeling the same. As Limbaugh will remind you, listen to his program for two weeks, and you will add to the more than 20 million who listen daily.
Art Roggenkamp
Camas
In a June 3 letter, "Negative talk is destructive," Kate Coen complains about Rush Limbaugh's negativity and vitriol and asks if the man ever has "anything constructive or positive to say." One can only wonder how constructive or positive Coen was when commenting to friends and associates on the eight years of the Bush administration. I'm sure she was positively effusive in her praises.
Mitch Moffett
Camas
In regards to Don Brunell's June 2 column, "Washingtonians send mixed signals on clean energy," it's ironic that this talking head would make his Wizard of Oz analogy when he so obviously has a man hiding behind his curtain. The one point I will agree with in his piece is that we do have some tough decisions to make. Unfortunately this representative of the Washington business community would have us believe that theses decisions are as cut and dry as "coal or death." This simply is not so.
For instance, a dialysis machine could be powered with an installation of aeroturbines, which are specifically designed to operate in urban surroundings and can be retrofitted to pre-existing structures. Emergency responders could get their diesel fuel from an algae farm. These farms have the ability to grow specific algae to accommodate a range of fuel types and just happen to have the beneficial aspect of recycling our air.
As for the "projections" of our future coal consumption, this sound likes the future of someone who has already made up their mind. It's true that some of these technologies may be expensive, but what is the cost of doing nothing?
Logan Cotey
Vancouver
Judy Dahlen's June 3 letter concerning, "Slow drivers clog passing lane," on I-5 during her commute to Kalama has to be corrected. First, the posted speed limit on any interstate or any other road for that matter is the maximum speed, even for the people who "stay in the passing lane going 70 mph." Drivers who are safety conscious drive according to weather, road conditions and other traffic.
I suggest Dahlen start a little earlier for her commute so she does not have to expect other safe drivers to get out of her way to accommodate her self-serving driving habits.
Robert Kerr
Vancouver
No doubt, I sound like a squawking Republican, but I do preach "conservative" in my household.
If I were president, I guarantee you that I wouldn't be sleeping too good at night with this war going on. Sure, it's nice to jet set out on date night with my honey on a private plane on the taxpayers' dime, but I have problems with that.
Yes, the Obamas impress the media as a hip, slick and cool family, but that is so shallow considering the needs of all of us. Yes, the president could sell ice to an Eskimo, but we're in trouble here and let's not forget it.
Glenn Alan Pierce
Battle Ground
Where is our representation in Congress? We voted for change and most Americans want single-payer health care based on Medicare — yet it's "not on the table."
Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., caved in to health care insurance and pharmaceutical companies, expelling single-payer advocates from participation in hearings. The "public option" being discussed will be structured to cost more. Private health insurance companies are afraid they can't compete. Our representatives, Sens. Maria Cantwell, Patty Murray and Rep. Brian Baird, are nowhere to be heard.
How much greed, profiteering and corruption must we endure? How many people must be denied coverage, go bankrupt and/or die before we get meaningful change?
The public single-payer option could be optional, with increased Medicare taxes. Those who don't want it could pay for private for-profit insurance.
Health care professionals do deserve to be well paid. Reducing for-profit private health insurance, eliminating million- or billion-dollar administrative compensation, and forcing corporations and the wealthy to pay their fair share by closing tax loopholes can provide substantial funding and save 30 percent or more of health care costs with far better care for everyone.
We need to start voting for people who will represent us in this matter.
Bob Donohoe
Vancouver
Accolades to eighth-grader Adam Kinkley for his May 30 letter, "Classrooms have too many students." However, he omitted one reason that all readers should remember. Not only will the current crops of students be caretakers, they will also be the ones whose incomes will be underwriting Social Security, et al, for senior citizens.
Oversimplified, the question becomes do you want your retirement financed by minimum wage earners, or a skilled work force?
George Young
Vancouver
by Ace High : 6/8/09 8:05am - Report Abuse
Glenn Alan Pierce,>>>> Sure, it's nice to jet set out on date night with my honey on a private plane on the taxpayers' dime, but I have problems with that.
He is the President of the United States. Where does it say that he shouldn't have time off?
I wouldn't be so quick to complain about our current Presidents expenditures accessed to pleasure trips. I wonder how much it costs tax payers for the presidential entourage to take a trip to .... say..... Crawford Texas?