<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion

Eyes in the sky: U.S. military is the best

By John Laird
Published: April 25, 2010, 12:00am

Over the past few years I’ve become a die-hard fan of the TV show “24.” My devotion has been fortified by obtaining a DVR that allows me to watch the show on my own schedule and to fast-forward through commercials. It saddens me that the final episode in the eight-year run of “24” will be shown on Monday, May 24. Life won’t be the same without my friends at the Counter Terrorist Unit reminding me each week that the good guys are still winning most of the struggles against evil, at least the fictional ones.

With each episode, “24” confirms for us faithful followers that, in the long run, conflicts are won by those with the most advanced technology. That superior science — to our good fortune — these days is possessed by the United States. So advanced are we that many of today’s toughest challenges are answered not by boots on the ground as occurred for America’s first two centuries, but by mouse-manipulating, keyboard-clicking geeks who stare at computer monitors.

Granted, steely-eyed, whispering Jack Bauer might get the most tube time and elicit the most swoons from groupies, but when CTU needs quick and accurate data, it’s the pouting but pert Chloe O’Brian who gets the job done back at the office. And when it comes to today’s nonfictional warfare, some of the most advanced military tools are researched, designed and manufactured within 70 miles of Clark County. Bingen, in the heart of the Columbia River Gorge, is the home of Insitu, a flourishing firm that specializes in camera-equipped drones. Insitu employs more than 700 people in several sites along or near the river; sales last year topped $148 million. Insitu’s unmanned aircraft have flown 38,000 sorties and spent 300,000 hours airborne. Increasingly, they play a major role for the U.S., flying reconnaissance missions that supply information for humans as well as for the military’s other weapons-loaded drones.

Cameras that save lives

The value of this technology cannot be exaggerated. It is not measured in sorties or hours but in lives saved through the use of pilotless aviation. Another measure is lives saved on the ground. “Quite literally, my son’s life was saved by (Insitu’s) ScanEagles,” RaeLynn Ricarte said in a recent story by The Oregonian’s Allan Brettman. According to Ricarte, videos from the drones showed improvised explosive devices being planted along a route that her son, a Marine, and others were to have traveled.

“We support the troops and any piece of equipment that brings them home safe,” said Ricarte, the founder of Gorge Heroes Club, which recently sent another spokeswoman to an April 17 rally in Hood River, Ore.

For reasons many of us cannot fathom, drone warfare is opposed by some people. Also speaking at that Hood River rally was peace activist Cindy Sheehan. We can all sympathize with Sheehan for the loss of her son Casey in the Iraq War, but when she and others oppose robotic combat, they demonstrate irrational views about the realities of war.

It’s true, attacks launched by drones can result in lives lost, some of them innocent. But as America has shown throughout our history, we do everything we can to minimize nonmilitary casualties. By contrast, many of our enemies are sworn to maximize the killing of innocent people. It doesn’t take a military expert to know that an unmanned drone carries a higher humanitarian quotient (at least for our side) than an aircraft that puts pilots and crew members in harm’s way.

Americans should never apologize for all of the mice and the keyboards we use in warfare. To do so would be to defy the previously presented truism, that conflicts are won by those with the most advanced technology.

I’ve often wondered what it would be like to interview Osama bin Laden. Given that opportunity, I would start with two questions:

If a divine creator really is on your side and I am the infidel as you insist, why does my America have all of the technology while you’re forced to skulk around at night from cave to cave?

When this interview is over, could you please go outside, look to the sky, smile and say “Cheese”?

John Laird is The Columbian’s editorial page editor. His column of personal opinion appears each Sunday. Reach him at john.laird@columbian.com.

Loading...