<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Study: Port rail plan needs $75M

Paulson: Chances of seeking tax hike are 'nonexistent'

By Aaron Corvin, Columbian Port & Economy Reporter
Published: August 21, 2010, 12:00am

A new study of the Port of Vancouver’s signature project — a planned 27-mile expansion of rail tracks to speed cargo and handle more of it — says the port will have to borrow as much as $75 million to cover a shortfall and should adopt plans to avoid cost overruns.

The West Vancouver Freight Access project will cost $148 million from 2011 to 2017, when it’s expected to be completed, according to the 174-page study by consulting firm Moffatt & Nichol. Facing a funding shortage of $63 million, the port must borrow a total of $75.5 million over the next seven years to cover both the construction cost and the roughly $12.8 million in interest expense associated with borrowing.

The study is the first comprehensive picture of a project that port officials believe could help them produce as many as 4,000 jobs in the region. Its findings will help drive the port’s decision about how to pay for the project and how to effectively manage it. No small effort, the West Vancouver Freight Access project is intended to increase the port’s rail track from 16.9 miles to more than 44 miles, adding capacity to handle freight and increasing the speed at which cargo moves along the BNSF Railway and Union Pacific main lines. Those main lines link the Pacific Northwest to major rail hubs in Chicago and Houston, and from Canada to Mexico.

In an interview, port administrators said they expect to go to the port’s elected board of commissioners in either late September or early October with recommendations on the best way to pay for the project. At least one option — using the port’s power to levy property taxes — already is off the table, said port Executive Director Larry Paulson. The chances voters will be asked for a property-tax increase to pay for the project, Paulson said, are “non-existent.”

Instead, the port plans to pursue what the study says is its best option: a loan through the Federal Rail Administration’s Railroad Rehabilitation and Investment Financing Program, which offers the port the greatest amount of flexibility as long as the port obtains an investment grade rating from a nationally recognized rating agency. The port’s most recent debt offering was rated A1 by Moody’s Investor Services and an AA- by Standard and Poor’s, according to the study.

Todd Coleman, deputy executive director for the port, said the agency hopes to obtain a Federal Rail Administration loan to cover all or most of the project’s estimated costs. “That’s our goal,” he said.

Port officials emphasized that the budget shortfall is no surprise, since they have anticipated the need to borrow money to cover the costs of such a capital-intensive project. Moreover, the port has been laying the groundwork to move the project forward, including acquiring key property, making rail improvements at its Terminal 5 and seeking other federal and state grants.

Coleman said the $75.5 million the study says the port will have to borrow is a “worst-case scenario.” If the economy improves, for example, the port could generate more revenue from rent or shipping fees, and therefore wouldn’t need to borrow as much.

What is clear, Paulson said, is that “we’re not going to build anything we can’t pay for.”

The port paid Moffatt & Nichol roughly $297,000 to conduct the study of the West Vancouver Freight Access project.

The project faces challenges, as the study points out:

• While the port has done a good job of diversifying its revenues, its borrowing costs could increase depending on fluctuations in cargo volumes, including components for producing wind energy — a sector that is “highly volatile” because its feasibility is “highly dependent on state and federal policy.”

• Under an agreement with BNSF Railway, the port is on the hook to complete parts of the West Vancouver Freight Access project by specific deadlines. Failure to meet these deadlines could potentially result in a lawsuit by BNSF or termination of the agreement by BNSF, among other things.

The study also recommends the port adopt cost controls, including detailed monthly cash flow projections and monthly cost-to-date and cost-to-complete analyses.

Coleman said the port already has cost-control measures in place but will make them “more formal” as the project moves forward. Paulson said one of the study’s recommendations — that the port secure a revenue-generating tenant for Terminal 5 to help pay for the project — is being taken care of: The port has reached a preliminary agreement to lease the property to Australian miner BHP Billiton for an export operation. That deal would also further diversify the port’s revenue base, helping guard it against dips in wind energy and other cargo volumes, port officials said.

Coleman said the port may seek to make “minor changes” to its agreement with BNSF on project schedules but that he doesn’t expect any problems with the rail company otherwise.

Loading...
Columbian Port & Economy Reporter