In Our View, Jan. 28: C’mon Over!
Oregon voters deliver two more reasons for businesses to move to Clark County
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Whatever government revenue might be generated by the passage of Measures 66 and 67 in Oregon on Tuesday, make no mistake that one result is simple and straightforward. It has allowed those who make decisions with taxpayer dollars to skate. Rather then solving the problem of paying too much out to everything — including salaries and benefits to Oregon state workers — legislators simply asked for, and received, more.
We hope Washington state is not next, but we suspect that all states — including ours — are in the reaching-deeper-into-our-pockets mood instead of getting their expenses under control.
In the meantime, we put out the welcome mat here in Clark County for Oregonians who want some relief. Our community has always been a great place to do business; as of Tuesday, it just got better. More than any immediate or statistical impact (we noticed no long line of northbound trucks moving companies here Wednesday morning), the benefits to Southwest Washington will evolve slowly and will be related to overall business climate. Even several days before the vote, a Saturday story by The Columbian’s Libby Tucker included this quote from Bart Phillips, president of the Columbia River Economic Development Council in Vancouver: “(Tuesday’s election has) already had its impact whether or not it passes, just because the specter of it causes instability. It shows the legislature is willing to increase corporate taxes …”
What we’re talking about here is an overall message from voters and politicians to entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and small businesses: “We’re going to sock it to you good, and we’ve got the public employee unions’ voter base, plus the deep campaign-spending pockets of those same unions, to pull this off.” And then, legislators will not only skate on their responsibilities to rein in an extravagant system of public employee pay and benefits, they’ll skate on their duty to reform government overall.
Measure 67 does more than just increase the corporate minimum tax from $10 annually to a sliding scale starting at $150 for companies with less than $500,000 in sales, up to $100,000 for companies with $100 million or more in sales. It also enforces the ghastly provision of making the tax retroactive, extending back to Jan. 31, 2009. (CEO: “Oops! I guess last year wasn’t as profitable as I thought!) To which Clark County economic development officials respond: “C’mon over!”
As for Measure 66, it increases state income taxes for individuals making more than $125,000 per year or families making more than $250,000. If that sounds like a minor hit on the rich, be advised that most businesses are led by people making more than $125,000. Furthermore, many of those leaders live in Clark County, and they’re sick of having to pay state income tax in Oregon. Combine those dual insults, and it makes even more sense to move a business across the river.
Here’s one last offensive message that was imparted to Oregon businesses: “We’re even willing to launch this assault on companies during the worst business climate in seven decades.”
Again, no significant impact should be expected here in coming days. But long-term, as Phillips noted, “it becomes a more appealing factor for businesses already considering a move.”
Clark County’s economic environment has long been penalized by business elements in adjacent Oregon. Now it’s good to have a business boost here because of something that happened there.
Rate this
You must be logged in to rate this.
Current Rating : Nobody has rated this article yet.
Comments
View all seven comments »
Although any migration of businesses from Oregon might spark our local economy, remember this that the people who currently work for these businesses will probably migrate as well. If you are employees from Vancouver, more power to you if your companies move here. To everyone else, don't expect a sudden growth in jobs except where commercial real estate sales, remodel or new construction comes into play.
goldenoldie — January 28, 2010 at 6:43 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
golden, while businesses moving over would bring people with them, not all would make the move. Once here, some might even become profitable again and be able to expand.
Also, some of those workers in Portland live in Clark County already and look at what that could do for us.
Of course you're right and it wouldn't be any overnight improvement, but a beginning. We have a lot of empty store space for lease around the county.
I urge all to contact our elected officials, council members and commissioners and tell them we need those jobs over here.
Oregon's folly can be our gain and we can begin to recover.
LewWaters — January 28, 2010 at 7:51 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Let me just try to understand... in the other article it says a business that has gross sales of 5 million will have to pay $4000 more in tax. What would be the cost of relocation? How many years of $4000 tax would it take to recover the cost? Where is the guarantee Washington isn't looking at Oregon right now and thinking about how to increase IT'S revenue (because they already talked about it after the vote).
I'm not holding my breath for the flood.
LB — January 28, 2010 at 7:53 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
"Where is the guarantee Washington isn't looking at Oregon right now..."
LB - you gotta know that's what the Gov and the Legislature are doing right now. Every blue state in the Union will be looking at Oregon as an example to follow. Right, stick it to corporations...and just ignore the reality that the corporations will merely look at the tax bill they receive in the mail and then hand it to you the consumer to pay.
Craig_Sayre — January 28, 2010 at 8:26 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Bart Phillips told the Oregonian, "it will be a unique situation where this triggers a relocation." In the 10 years he has worked for the CREDC, Phillips has seen businesses move from Oregon to Clark County -- but has also seen businesses move from Washington to Oregon. "Taxes are just one of a number of considerations for expanding or relocating, be that across the river or across the nation or across the globe."
"Don't look for Oregon companies to flee state over new taxes" http://www.oregonlive.com/clark-county/index.ssf/2010/01/dont_look_for_oregon_companies_to_flee_state_over_66_67.html
We've outdone ourselves by achieving the state's highest unemployment. Our ratio of jobs to dwellings is sick.
Rather than hope Oregon will fix our job crisis, shouldn't we find a way to kick our economic addiction to new housing development?
JaMi — January 28, 2010 at 2:10 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Clark County's tax base and economy teeters on home values -- an imbalance of dwellings to jobs created over many years.
If that's not reason for heartburn, consider that local lending institutions are thwarted from moving ahead with a heavy backlog of foreclosure sales because that puts instant downward pressure on all home prices.
Finally, of all the industries that county government has to choose from, it decides to dole out incentives to homebuilders -- prolonging the inventory crisis.
Property taxes skyrocket but nobody can afford to sell. Reverse mortgages flourish simply to tread water.
JaMi — January 28, 2010 at 2:54 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Or login with: