Kaiser study urges early usage of diabetes drug
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Did you know?
Metformin helps to control the amount of glucose (sugar) in your blood. It decreases the amount of glucose you absorb from your food and the amount of glucose made by your liver. Metformin also increases your body’s response to insulin, a natural substance that controls the amount of glucose in the blood. Metformin is not used to treat type 1 diabetes, a condition in which the body does not produce insulin and therefore cannot control the amount of sugar in the blood.
SOURCE: National Library of Medicine, at the National Institutes of Health
When some people learn they have diabetes, their first treatment response involves willpower instead of medication.
That’s a bad idea for people living with type 2 diabetes, say Kaiser Permanente researchers.
The sooner people with diabetes start taking metformin, the longer it remains effective, according to a study that included more than 400 Vancouver-area Kaiser members.
The medication eventually stops working in most patients, forcing them to take other drugs to control their blood sugar. Each additional drug adds extra costs and the possibility of more side effects, including weight gain. Early use of metformin, an inexpensive generic pill, can help deter extra costs and side effects, researchers say.
“If you started early, within three months of diagnosis, you fail at a rate of 12 percent a year,” said Gregory Nichols, co-author of the study and an investigator with the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research in north Portland. For people who wait a year or more, the failure rate almost doubles.
“People are reluctant to go to medication, and that’s not exclusive to diabetes,” Nichols said in an interview Tuesday. “They go with diet and exercise, which not only is a viable option, but the primary thing anyway, so it’s easy for physicians and patients to say: ‘Give that a try.’ But the study shows that even if you want to try that, start the drug immediately, as well.”
The failure rate per year for patients who started taking metformin one to two years after diagnosis is 21.4 percent.
“The sooner they start taking metformin, the better and longer it seems to work,” wrote the study’s lead author, Jonathan B. Brown, an investigator with the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research. “This study suggests that to gain full benefit from metformin, patients should start taking it as soon as they find out they have diabetes.”
“We believe that starting the drug early preserves the body’s own ability to control blood sugar, which in turn prevents the long-term complications of diabetes like heart disease, kidney failure and blindness,” Nichols wrote in the report.
About 30 million people worldwide are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes every year.
The study was published in the March issue of Diabetes Care, a journal of the American Diabetes Association.
Researchers used electronic health records to follow nearly 1,800 people with diabetes in Kaiser Permanente’s health plan in Washington and Oregon for up to five years. About 15 percent of Kaiser’s Northwest membership is in Clark County.
This is the first study to compare metformin failure rates in a real-world, clinical practice setting. Other studies compared failure rates of metformin only in clinical trials.
Tom Vogt: 360-735-4558 or tom.vogt@columbian.com.
Rate this
You must be logged in to rate this.
Current Rating : Nobody has rated this article yet.
Comments
View all seven comments »
The VA recently diagnosed me with Type 2 Diabetes. Previous efforts at diet wasn't working and they prescribed Glipizide (the generic name, as I understand it) the same day I was diagnosed.
My blood sugar dropped as did my blood sugar.
This sounds like a study well worth it.
LewWaters — March 10, 2010 at 8:11 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
This story is nice, but my direct experience and that for at least one other person I know is that Kaiser does a horrible job of communicating the info for a new diagnosis. For me they apparently found this out when I went in for a visit but they failed to clearly tell me. I got confusing phone calls and more confusing info in the mail, never once telling me they had diagnosed diabetes. My calls back to an advice nurse got me no where. I even went back into their system 6 months later for an operation and it never came up. Kaiser failed me PERIOD and I had to find out when I had a true emergency a year later. There is little good giving us this kind of info and advice if real people and doctors in Kaiser don't own the human element of communication. They do a horrible job and always have in my opinion. Articles like this aren't a good substitute for talking about it day to day.
celticode — March 10, 2010 at 8:15 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
After reading celticode's comment I was reluctant to say anything, but after reading this story I'm even more grateful for my PCP at Vancouver Clinic, who, the moment my A1C hit the magic number, placed me on metformin immediately. This was 16 months ago, so assuming this study wasn't reviewed & published till afterward, my dr. was extraordinarily proactive, and now I'm especially grateful. In fact, she didn't wait for A1C to hit the AMA standard of 8.0, we started treatment at 7.1. I couldn't have hoped for better results.
indypendent_jones — March 10, 2010 at 10:57 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Celicode, I'm sorry you have had a bad experience with your Kaiser PPC dr. Both my husband & I have had great follow up care with our doctors and they have stayed on top of our care. My advise to you would be to find a different one & keep trying until you find one that best fits you & your needs. Also, when I feel some dept has missed taking care of me or my husband, I get on the phone & call the supervisor of the dept or membership services & let them know how we were treated. It at least makes me feel better to vent to them than to sit & let my anger simmer. I've heard these horror stories from people that are outside of Kaiser. I've been with them for over 50 years & the small time I had a different carrier, I couldn't wait to get back with Kaiser. Good luck in the future with your diabetes. My husband was diagnosed last Dec. & it's a hard adjustment.
lilygrace — March 10, 2010 at 11:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Lets continue letting the media and big money guide us like sheep away from universal healthcare.
freedom_1_0_1 — March 10, 2010 at 4:26 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Again all this good, but how can I know there is problem when they didn't even tell me of one. Let me repeat this one point, they claimed a year later they had told me this information but they clearly had not. I went in for an OPERATION a full 6 months after my first dr visit and in check and blood work for that procedure NOTHING was brought about any issues, diagnosis or concerns real big or otherwise. They blew it and they did admit it but the dr then did nothing that I could tell and she never responded to my messages to discuss it after the fact. When I did get sick I was with another carrier and all was more or less fine, but at the time of real effect Kaiser dropped the ball. So don't go telling us to consider early treatment blah blah blah when your means of normal communication leave far too much to desire. These are just sales words no more no less. By the way my A1C dropped from 14 to less than 6 with metformin and all the rest within 4 months. All is more or less good now. Thanks
celticode — March 10, 2010 at 4:27 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
You would be shocked if you knew the differences in medical opinions within any group practice, and that is not limited to Kaiser Clinics. I complained to my own cardiologist, who took over the patients of a very experienced retiring cardiologist. He and my primary care doctor had independently asked me to go to a hospital emergency room on the basis of one blood test. I finally relented, but then a different doctor from the same group who had been called for another patient examined me and concluded there was no cause for concern because such a low value on that blood test was not out of the ordinary for patients with a prior heart bypass surgery. He kept me overnight for observation primarily so my own cardiologist would see me there in the morning where he ordered an echo cardiogram which showed my heart was fine..
Based on my observations as a patient for over six decades, being a doctor is 40% science, 20% clinical experience, 15% attentive listening to patients, 15% staying well read about new developments in medicine and clinical practice, and 10% the practical art of doing exams, etc. A lot of overtime is of course due to legal requirements to document care and especially burdensome requirements of insurance companies justifying payment. (My doctor often spend an hour with me and sees me as the last patient of the day, but only bills for a half hour rather than do all the extra writing it would take to justify an hour visit to my insurance company. He is in medicine to be a doctor, not a writer.
My doctor often works as much as another four hours after the clinic closes and patients have left to keep up with his profession and all the paperwork duties, letters to insurance companies, calls to patients that his nurse can't handle, and to otherwise make up for time loss during the day to dealing with insurance companies, etc. Insurance companies seem to give nurses and clerks more authority than doctors when it comes to deciding on whether or not to pay a medical bill.
The happiest doctors don't ever get sued by regular patients primarily because they have earned the trust and loyalty of patients who believe they have the best interests of their patients at heart and realize they are in the end just human beings too if they make a mistake. No one is perfect. My own primary doctor has such strong patient loyalty that he could move to any clinic in town or open his own practice and he wouldn't lose a single patient with the transportation to get to his new location. We would even continue to see him at least once a year for an opinion if he were no longer in our health plan.
SeniorMoment — March 12, 2010 at 1:36 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Or login with: