<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Tuesday,  April 23 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Northwest

Role of attorney general argued before court

The Columbian
Published: November 18, 2010, 12:00am

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — Washington’s Supreme Court is hearing arguments on two lawsuits that question the scope of Attorney General Rob McKenna’s authority.

The court first heard arguments Thursday in a case over whether McKenna had legal authority to sign onto a multistate challenge to the national health care reform law.

Laura Wishik, a Seattle assistant city attorney, says McKenna exceeded his authority when he made the state a plaintiff in the case. State Solicitor General Maureen Hart, representing McKenna, says the attorney general has that authority under state law.

The court also is to hear a case raised by the state’s public lands commissioner on whether McKenna can refuse to continue suing when a state agency wants him to.

Loading...