<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Letter: Theories alter with new research

The Columbian
Published: August 21, 2011, 5:00pm

I must disagree with the opinion expressed in Gene Dombrowski’s Aug. 15 letter, “Unconscious prejudice guides theory,” regarding Dr. Stephen Hawking’s theory (hypothesis) of how the universe began. It has been human nature to attribute unknown events to some supernatural being. Over time, accumulated knowledge and technology have brought to light the workings of nature.

Science starts with a hypothesis, then goes through observation and testing, to develop a theory. The theory remains in force until new information may determine that it is false.

Many theories have be in existence for more than a hundred years, and no one has been able to prove that they are false. These theories include gravity and evolution.

Dombrowski states that science has not explained how lift came into being. I would like to refer him, and others who are interested, to recently published research in Nature Chemistry 2011, out of the University of California, Merced. This is the beginning of how life started and more research needs to be done, but it clearly points to natural processes, not a supernatural being.

Steve Engard

Ridgefield

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...