<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  April 24 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Balancing is not so simple

The Columbian
Published: December 15, 2011, 4:00pm

A balanced federal budget sounds like a good thing. Certainly we were well on our way in that direction when George H.W. Bush entered the White House.

But during his tenure, we had a vice president, Dan Quayle, who said that Ronald Reagan had “proved deficits don’t matter.” Under the Bush administration, the national debt grew by $4 trillion.

Under present conditions, if the so-called Balanced Budget Amendment had become law, according to a report by Macroeconomic Advisors — a nationally known economic consulting firm — the $1.5 trillion in spending cuts the amendment would authorize, in 2012 alone, would have resulted in the loss of 15 million more jobs nationally, doubling the unemployment rate from 9 percent to approximately 18 percent.

This would have caused the over-all economy to shrink by about 17 percent. “The effect on the economy would be catastrophic,” the report concluded.

Economics is not the simple matter some would have us believe. We can’t run the country the same way we run a household budget, or even the way most businesses run.

In making voting decisions, it would be a good idea to take a realistic look at how we got here before we espouse simple-minded solutions.

Sandra Cole

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...