In Our Vew: Debit Fees Doused
Bank customers might celebrate short-term, but the dispute is far from over
Thursday, November 3, 2011
When several national banks announced they would start charging customers monthly fees for using debit cards (essentially, fees for people to access their own money), customers had reason to be angry … but not surprised. Even the casual observer of the banking industry should’ve seen this coming last year when new federal regulations limited “swipe fees” that banks charge merchants on debit card transactions.
The result of the new regulations was accurately described by American.com Editor Nick Schulz, whose op-ed appeared in the Oct. 23 Columbian: “And so banks have done exactly as they said they would do, raise fees elsewhere to make up for the lost revenue, estimated at over $6 billion.”
Regardless, the customers’ anger could not be ignored. After countless client outbursts and organized defections to other institutions such as credit unions, the banks reversed their field. Bank of America Corp. this week said it would abandon its plan to start charging a $5 monthly fee next year for debit card purchases. Earlier, Wells Fargo & Co. canceled a similar test program that was running in five states, and JPMorgan Chase & Co. did the same thing with pilot programs in two states. The lesson was quickly learned: In a competitive financial environment, customers will always be highly discerning, but even more so when they’re trying to keep their heads above water during an economic crisis.
This abrupt course correction demonstrates the power of an irate customer base, but before taking a victory lap, the major-bank patrons should remember two points. First, while charging people monthly fees to access their own money through debit cards was a flawed approach, the banks surely will find other ways to regenerate that revenue source. It could be through increased fees for using checking accounts or ATMs, or other actions. Second, public ire would be more suitably directed toward Congress instead of the major banks. Swipe-fee reform limited banks to charging 21 cents on a typical debit card transaction. Previously, banks were charging merchants an average of 44 cents.
Each side of this issue — supporters of the legislation as well as opponents — presents a strong case. Consider the argument from Mallory Duncan, senior vice president of the National Retail Federation, whose op-ed also was published in the Oct. 23 Columbian. Duncan reported that “the actual cost to banks for processing a debit card transaction was approximately 4 cents.” Even after the debit card reform, “banks will still be able to charge a 425 percent markup on debit card transactions.” Furthermore, “the fight over debit card swipe fees is likely just the opening salvo in a long-running debate about how open and transparent banks should be about fees. Next on the agenda will be reform of credit card fees, which are even more excessive than debit fees and just as obscure.”
For now, the only certain winners are credit unions and community banks. Here in Clark County, research by Columbian reporter Gordon Oliver reveals that Columbia Credit Union had a 15 percent membership growth in the past year, and iQ Credit Union garnered 25 percent more new accounts last month than in October 2010. Statewide, BECU (a credit union originally for Boeing employees but now open to many Washingtonians) has broken new-member records for three months in a row. About 3,000 BECU members live in Clark County.
The outcome of this financial competition is difficult to predict, but the progenitor of the dispute — federal banking reform — should be easily understood. And every stakeholder should agree on the main ingredient in a recipe that would be palatable to all. It is a sustained economic recovery.