<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Opposition to biomass misinformed

The Columbian
Published: November 5, 2011, 5:00pm

Why the controversy over the proposed biomass plant? What’s not to like about the project? It will provide renewable and sustainable energy; save the taxpayers millions of dollars; create family-wage jobs; require no public financing; and comply with all environmental and air quality regulations.

To compare this project to wood-fired boilers and smokestacks of old is disingenuous and be like comparing the performance of a 1954 Rambler to a 2012 Chevy Volt. Innovation and technology have made it possible to design biomass energy plants that are safe, efficient, attractive and environmentally compliant.

Thousands of biomass energy plants are currently operating successfully in the U.S., Canada and Europe. In northern Europe, a significant portion of their energy needs are produced from combined heat and power plants fueled by biomass. Many of these biomass-fueled plants are located in the central city core to take advantage of low-cost heating and cooling. Similarly, there are biomass energy plants located on college and high school campuses across the U.S.

I would suggest that the city of Vancouver look to recent examples of biomass energy plants constructed in the U.S. and then collaborate with Clark County on the permitting and design of a biomass plant that would meet performance and aesthetic requirements.

David Halme

Battle Ground

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...