<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Letter: We already have rationing

The Columbian
Published: April 25, 2012, 5:00pm

The Independent Payment Advisory Board, the agency created by the Affordable Care Act, has the power to force payment cuts to service providers if costs rise beyond certain levels and Congress fails to substitute its own plan for savings. But the law explicitly forbids the board from rationing care, shifting costs to seniors, or cutting their benefits. The board would put the burden of providing cost-effective outcomes on service providers, such as drug companies and insurers.

In their hysterical cries against “rationing,” the IPAB naysayers conveniently neglect to note that the system we currently have includes rationing — rationing dictated by insurance companies and one’s ability to pay. Logically, the only people who should be opposed to IPAB are providers who reap the benefits of fee-for-service medicine, and the only people opposed to the individual mandate should be those who now are getting a free ride. Yet the GOP has convinced millions that this is somehow an assault on their freedom. In a way, I suppose it is. They are no longer free to get sick and stick the rest of us with the tab.

Robert Cuti

Battle Ground

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...