<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Tuesday,  April 23 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Social Security is partner in mess

The Columbian
Published: December 23, 2012, 4:00pm

Columnist Ann McFeatters writes, “Social Security is a separate revenue pot that has nothing to do with the national budget deficit.” Really?

Contributions are a wage tax that doesn’t apply to higher-income individuals. The revenue is invested in government bonds and loans, which spends it while also borrowing freely elsewhere during the period when the baby boom provided a large workforce from which to extract taxes.

Now baby boomers are retiring, the taxable workforce is shrinking, and retirement expenses exceed Social Security revenues and contribute to government debt (http://usdebtclock.org). Where will the government get the money to pay for the bonds and the expenses?

U.S. debt’s largest holders are the Federal Reserve via quantitative easing, the Social Security Trust, and China. The Federal Reserve’s printing limits are unlimited, other nations are currently willing to buy U.S. bonds, and the constrained interest rates minimize the expense of holding that debt while reducing the return on the money invested by the Trust and by anyone who saved.

World War II debt was conveniently repaid by devaluing the money. Inflation is a silent tax, primarily taxing the unsophisticated and unsuspecting.

Social Security is a separate entity in the same way that off-balance-sheet wars aren’t an expense. Asserting that it is otherwise doesn’t contribute to public understanding.

Merv Murphy

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...