<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday, March 29, 2024
March 29, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Letter: This is no way to reduce the debt

The Columbian
Published: February 9, 2012, 4:00pm

Let’s look at the Feb. 1 story, “A bounce in their step,” regarding a rubber sidewalk. These sidewalks are “used in about 60 cities nationwide.” Melissa Tiefenthaler, co-chair of the Hough Neighborhood Association, received a $3,078 grant from the Vancouver Office of Neighborhood’s Safe Neighborhoods Street Fund — I spell that “tax dollars.” Vancouver Watersheds Alliance contributed another $1,500 — some of which may be from government dollars.

So $4,578 was spent in grants to fix sidewalks.

What else did Vancouver do? Charge a $2,087 “road modification permit” (excuse me, they reduced it to $1,077). Per Matt Ransom, city of Vancouver planning manager, Vancouver needed to “go through that process to make sure the material is safe.” How much does a phone call cost to call one of the “60 cities” to ask if it is safe? Obviously, $1,077.

Why not ask the taxpayers which agency to cut to reduce the debt?

Richard Schaff

VANCOUVER

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...