Did you miss having a presidential primary in Washington state this year? Were those Republican caucuses on March 3 (and the Democratic caucuses-to-be on April 15) enough to satisfy your desire to help select presidential nominees for the respective parties? And are you glad the state saved about $10 million by not having a presidential primary this year? (The same decision was made, for the same reason, in 2004).The Columbian editorially supported the decision to suspend the presidential primary and save the public money. Another reason — we pointed out — was that the primary had so little influence. Republicans were using the primary to select only half of their delegates, and Democrats were totally ignoring the results and selecting all of their delegates through the caucuses.
In other words, our state didn’t need a $10 million beauty contest … at least not in 2012.
But there remains a much better process for Washingtonians to help nominate presidential candidates, and we’ll start our presentation with two questions, one for local Republicans and one for statewide Democrats:
Clark County Republicans, as a party that laudably stresses outreach and inclusion, would you rather have 4,300 people participating in caucuses (as happened this year) or 38,176 people voting in the local GOP presidential primary (as happened in 2008)? We know, you’re mighty proud of that 4,300 turnout earlier this month, and you should be. It was about triple the crowd four years ago. But wouldn’t you rather have almost nine times as many people under your big tent?