<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Letter: Nike shows inconsistent policies

The Columbian
Published: October 27, 2012, 5:00pm

Nike’s decision to drop Lance Armstrong from its endorsement list reveals a sad dichotomy that exists in sports today. Armstrong, as an upstanding white role model, is held to a much higher standard than most black athletes. He has suffered intense scrutiny for years. He has always remained professional despite constant attacks on his ability and his character. As a cancer survivor, life priorities change, and he decided that he no longer wanted to continue to battle governing agencies to prove his innocence. Despite the allegations he remains inspirational as a creator of the LiveStrong Foundation. This is in total contrast to Nike’s support of Michael Vick, a quarterback with minimal success, a felony conviction with jail time, and questionable character at best.

Nike views a convicted black athlete not in a jail as a role model but a legendary white cyclist accused repeatedly without proof as a pariah.

— John Luckwitz, Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...