<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 19 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Movie interpretation was biased

The Columbian
Published: September 2, 2012, 5:00pm

Beth Fouhy’s Associated Press Aug. 29 story, “Many claims in Obama film don’t hold water,” shows her own bias more than anything else, that, and she didn’t really watch the film, “2016: Obama’s America,” at least not with an unbiased eye. Her reporting unfairly represents the film with an obvious liberal bias. Several of the “doesn’t hold water” points are not, in fact, how those items were presented in the movie.

For example, she accuses narrator Dinesh D’Souza of ignoring the debt incurred under President George W. Bush, and yet the film clearly accounted for the debt increases attributable to Bush.

All her other bullet points are equally arguable in their representation of how those items are presented in the film. What clearly is left out are the many other correlations made in the film regarding offshore drilling, Obamacare, etc. This story should have been published on the Opinion page.

John Kimsey

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...