<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Opposition to coal exports praised

The Columbian
Published: April 13, 2013, 5:00pm

Govs. Jay Inslee and John Kitzhaber came through for us all by joining together in urging our federal government to address global air quality consequences of proposed coal export projects (“Governors ask Obama to evaluate coal exports,” March 25, 2013). They cite direct costs being imposed on people, businesses, and communities in the U.S. and around the world by increasing greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants resulting from burning coal. Inevitable environmental and health costs are simply too high a price for local and regional communities to endure so that out-of-state companies can profit at our expense.

Negligible job creation and potential tax revenues have been touted by coal export proponents as a justifiable rationale for running coal exports through the Northwest. The truth is that these questionable “benefits” simply do not hold up under careful analysis as viable offsets to the significant harm (to our air, water, health, and quality of life) that will unfold should coal exports through the Pacific Northwest proceed as proposed.

Cathryn Chudy

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...