<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 19 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Third bridge idea is fatally flawed

The Columbian
Published: July 8, 2013, 5:00pm

So now that they have killed the Columbia River Crossing, certain Republicans are trumpeting a third bridge across the Columbia. No doubt this is to be done without tolls or new taxes.

I often wonder what planet these people live on.

If we cannot replace a worn-out, failing, old bridge, how could we ever find the will and the money to build a new bridge and the required highways? You cannot simply plunk down a new bridge. You would need to build a freeway system to support it on both sides of the river tied into the existing I-5 and I-205. The cost would be way higher, astronomical.

Plus, do you know anyone in Portland or Vancouver who wants a new freeway running through their neighborhood? The political battles would dwarf the CRC feuding.

I had mixed feelings about the CRC, but I think in a few years, when we still don’t have a new bridge, the $450 million state share will seem a bargain. I’m retired, but I did the horrible Vancouver-to-Portland commute for 30 years, mostly on mass transit. If I had another decade to work, I’d throw in the towel and move to Portland.

Sam Siciliano

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...