At 100, state parks feeling funding crisis

None of Southwest Washington’s three state parks contains significant historical buildings, but all offer camping and waterfront access. They are:

o Battle Ground Lake State Park. The closest state park to Vancouver, the 280-acre park rings a lake in a volcanic crater, a miniature version of Oregon’s famous Crater Lake. The campground has 41 sites, some of which cannot be accessed by car, and four cabins. Swimming and fishing are popular, and there are several miles of hiking, biking and horse trails.

o Paradise Point State Park. Tucked next to and in one spot directly under Interstate 5 along the East Fork of the Lewis River, 88-acre Paradise Point has 76 campsites and 6,180 feet of beach access for swimming and fishing. There are two miles of hiking trails.

o Beacon Rock State Park. Off state Highway 14 in Skamania County, 5,100-acre Beacon Rock has an older campground that the park’s website warns is better for tenters than RVs. Beacon Rock is the park’s outstanding natural feature; named by Lewis and Clark in 1805, the unusual monolith is the remaining core of an ancient volcano. A trail leads to the top for a panoramic view of the Columbia River Gorge. That trail is currently closed due to a rock slide, according to the park’s website. The park offers other trails for hiking, biking and horseback riding, and there is access to the Columbia River.

SEATTLE — Washington’s park system turns 100 this year, but not since the Great Depression has it been so imperiled.

In a historic site near Chehalis, Washington’s first courthouse is rotting from the ground up. Outside Ellensburg, at Olmstead Place State Park, heirloom hand-stitched dresses are moth-eaten and the walls water-stained in one of the earliest farmsteads in Eastern Washington.

At Lake Wenatchee State Park, extensive wreckage caused by winter storms is still on the ground, with another season about to open. At Flaming Geyser State Park in Auburn, a historic lodge renovated to host weddings — a hoped-for moneymaker for the parks — sits shuttered because there’s no money for needed water, sewer and electrical repairs.

All over the state, many of Washington’s 117 parks, 700 historic buildings and 33 heritage centers and interpretive sites are showing signs of neglect and even abandonment as a result of dramatic budget cuts.

“The governor is a big supporter of state parks,” said David Postman, spokesman for the governor. He said Inslee’s coming budget proposal will reflect that. “Parks are struggling, and it gets worse every year. We can’t let that go on; it gets harder and harder to get them back where they need to be.”

In a park system in which more than 30 percent of the land base was donated by families, the parks’ state of diminishment and disrepair is unacceptable, some said.

“Families gave this land believing it would be taken care of,” said Ralph Munro, former secretary of state.

“They (the lands) were donated by individual families, who didn’t charge us for them, who gave them to the state and entrusted their care and their upkeep and their future in the state. And now we’re breaking that trust, we’re violating that trust, and that’s wrong.”

He spoke standing on the porch of the John R. Jackson House, part of Jackson House State Park in Chehalis. The structure predates Washington’s statehood, and the homestead served its early community as a post office, grocery store, tavern, inn and courthouse. Its rotting foundation can be flaked with a finger.

The roots of the parks crisis are in the recession, which reduced the amount of state tax money available for everything in state government. As lawmakers scrambled to pay for basic health-care services for the poor and elderly, and for education, parks seemed an easy target.

Once, it was all free

From saltwater to scab lands, the park system has had something for everybody. In the past, there were guided ranger walks in the woods, lifeguards on the beaches, interpretive guides at the state’s historic sites, expansive campsites with well-maintained facilities — and no entrance fees.

Not anymore. Wrestling with diminishing revenue, state lawmakers enacted the parks’ first parking fees in 2002. Trying to keep parks open, the state first imposed a $5 parking fee. It was replaced in 2006 with a $5 voluntary donation collected with vehicle license fees — next converted to a fee extracted automatically unless drivers chose to opt out.

The amount of state funding for parks continued to crater, from 63 percent of the $149 million total budget in 2007-09 to 18 percent of the $121 million budget this biennium.

The percentage of the agency’s budget coming from user fees did soar from about 25 percent to more than 40 percent between 2000 and 2010. But it wasn’t enough.

As the recession bottomed out, then-Gov. Gregoire announced, while putting her budget together in 2010 for the coming biennium, that the state’s share of the parks budget would have to be supported by user fees.

The Legislature launched the Discover Pass in 2011, charging visitors $30 a year to use state park facilities.

Meanwhile, all over the state, portions of trails, scenic overlooks and campgrounds are cordoned off because there is no money to repair or maintain them. Since 2000, 12 parks have been transferred to local, federal or tribal governments, or closed.

The state used to operate a string of parks along the Snake River, built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of its mitigation for construction of Snake River dams. Today one park is closed, one operates a few hours a year when volunteers help, and another is open only seasonally by a concessionaire.

Even state legislators who pushed hardest for a user-fee system say the effort has run aground. This has to be the year for a turnaround, some lawmakers say, and it should be a permanent one.

Rep. Ross Hunter, D-Medina, the chief budget-writer for the House, said funding parks is good for business and the state’s quality of life.

“We are not trying to be Arkansas. We are not trying to drive the state tax system into the ground. We are trying to say what are the right set of purposes that people want, and in my district, people want parks,” he said.

“It’s one of the huge attractions of our state and why we have the high-tech community that is driving the economy. Stiffing the state parks … Are you serious?”