NEW YORK — Machinima, the sprawling digital gaming network, could hang a McDonald’s-like sign outside its Los Angeles headquarters: More than 37.4 billion videos served.
That’s how many views the Machinima network has generated. And it all started with one video.
Allen DeBevoise and his brother, Philip, acquired Machinima Inc. in 2005, but didn’t start developing it on the then-nascent YouTube until 2007. One of its first series came from a user named “SodaGod.” The series, “Inside Halo,” served as a center for enthusiasm for the popular science fiction video game franchise. Six years later, Machinima has grown into one of the most successful networks on YouTube, a gamer hub composed of a little expensively produced original programming, and a whole lot of user-generated videos.
While the land rush to stream “premium” original content is drawing an increasing number of video professionals to the Web, YouTube’s swelling multichannel networks are finding success with a more organic, bottom-up approach.
“The programming model of the future, where I think Machinima plays in, is in connecting that whole relationship, where we don’t think of it as either being user-generated or as being traditionally made by a professional creator,” says DeBevoise, chief executive of Machinima. “We think it’s a continuum and they both co-exist in the same world.”
Machinima, Maker Studios, Fullscreen and others have assembled broad networks, each encompassing thousands of YouTube creators. They’re dependably ranked among the most-viewed destinations on YouTube in comScore’s monthly online video rankings. In February, Fullscreen drew 36.8 million unique viewers, 30.5 million tuned into Maker, and Machinima, with a leading 61.4 minutes per visit, had 21 million viewers. Each network averages around 2 billion views a month.
You could say that they’re like the NBC, CBS and ABC of YouTube, but the more appropriate comparison might be to media parent companies. Only rather than having a few dozen cable networks under their global umbrella, they have 5,000 to 10,000 YouTube channels.
“We see ourselves as kind of the next-gen Viacom,” says George Strompolos, founder and chief executive of Fullscreen, a company with 150 employees founded in 2011. “We think we’re at the beginning of the opportunity to build a large-scale, sustainable new media business on the Internet.”
Much of the conversation about online video has lately been dominated by Hollywood digital productions. But for every “House of Cards” on Netflix, there are dozens of less noteworthy attempts to bring television-style content to online video. These upper-echelon YouTube networks are interested in high-quality programming, too, but their model is more of a hybrid that places pricier productions atop a pyramid of user-generated videos.
“We feel like ‘premium’ is so subjective,” says Danny Zappin, chief executive and co-founder of Maker Studios, which uses two production studios and 300-plus employees to assist YouTubers in production and marketing. “What is premium? For us, we feel like it’s an engaged audience who has a personal connection to the person they’re watching. To us, that’s more premium or more valuable than, say, high production value or a mainstream celebrity. You can’t have just one or the other. You’ve got to have both to really work on YouTube.”
Maker, Machinima and Fullscreen operate in different ways, but they and a growing number of YouTube networks all take the philosophy that there’s strength in numbers. By gathering thousands of channels together, all — at least theoretically — benefit from shared production tools, greater exposure and ultimately, hopefully larger advertising dollars.