<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  April 24 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Agribusiness claims are misguided

The Columbian
Published: May 9, 2013, 5:00pm

GE (or GMO) foods are not the result of traditional cross-breeding.

Initiative 522 calls for the labeling of food above .09 percent GE (or GMO) content. Washingtonians will see this on the ballot in November.

Agribusiness will tell voters there is little difference between GE/GMO organisms and traditionally bred crops.

Classical plant breeding is the crossing of related individuals to produce varieties with desirable properties. These are always related individuals. Unrelated species do not cross breed in nature. Genetically Engineered (Modified) organisms are those whose genetic characteristics have been altered by the insertion of a modified gene or a gene from another, usually unrelated organism by artificial means using techniques of genetic engineering. These crosses cannot occur through natural means.

Agribusiness claims there is no potential harm in consuming these organisms, but has not proved them safe. Some citizens object to consuming these organisms on various grounds including health, religion and issues of traditional culture. It is difficult to determine the origin of the food in our grocery stores because labels do not disclose GE/GMO status.

Ultimately, we have a right to know what is in our food. Vote “yes” on I-522. More information at: Label GMO Foods.

Gail Bonefeole

VANCOUVER

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...