<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Tuesday,  April 23 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Clark County News

Public employee pensions said rosier

Report still recommends state lower its assumed investment return

The Columbian
Published: September 20, 2013, 5:00pm

Olympia — State actuary Matt Smith’s latest report on the financial health of Washington’s public employee pension projects continued improvement despite a financial dip during the past few years. But Smith still thinks the state needs to ratchet down its assumed investment return to 7.5 percent by 2021-23 — a suggestion the Legislature has yet to fully heed.

Smith’s biennial report on pension health also cautions that state and local governments face a potential $1.3 billion financial hit in 2015-17 if two legal challenges to legislative reforms are overturned by the state Supreme Court.

The court is hearing arguments in the pension cases Oct. 24. At issue are two of the Legislature’s decisions in recent years: to repeal automatic cost-of-living increases for participants in several first-generation pension plans, and to repeal a law that once let employees share in stock gains when investment returns on pensions were red-hot over several consecutive years.

Smith gave a verbal version of his report Tuesday to the Legislature’s Select Committee on Pension Policy, a bipartisan committee chaired by Rep. Timm Ormsby, D-Spokane, that also has members from government agencies and retirees.

Overall, Smith said the outlook is for continued improvement in pension health as the investment climate recovers and as the Legislature’s changes in pension policy play out. But he is asking lawmakers to reconsider his recommendation from 2011 — to lower the state’s assumed earnings from pension investments to 7.5 percent by 2021-23.

Lawmakers previously accepted only a portion of that recommendation, agreeing to lower the assumption to 7.7 percent for 2017-19. Ormsby said the pension committee and the Pension Funding Council that acts on its recommendations have previously backed the 7.5 percent rate, but members have not discussed it this time around.

“I don’t anticipate it being controversial” for the committee, Ormsby said, calling the 7.5 percent target a good one. “I’d like to land on the side of more conservative.”

About three-fourths of pension benefits are paid out of investment earnings, so investment assumptions are important. Higher assumptions mean lower contributions by the state, local governments and workers.

A decade ago, the state bumped its assumed return to 8 percent, a goal that has proven hard to match as the country moves out of the Great Recession. Smith’s report said actual returns have been an average 2.95 percent over the past five years.

Loading...