From a philosophical standpoint, a new proposal in King County cuts right to the heart of an ongoing debate among Americans.
Namely, what is (or should be) the role of government? Where do we draw the line of demarcation between government involvement and personal responsibility? What is the role of government as a protector of the people from themselves? The answers could lead to a Ph.D. dissertation, but for now we shall limit our discussion to the proposal that is on the table — raising the age for purchasing tobacco to 21.
That is the suggestion from the King County Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Administrative Board, a 15-member volunteer board created to provide input to health officials in the state’s most populous county. The board has proposed raising the legal age for buying tobacco products from 18 to 21, bringing it in line with alcohol sales and the recreational use of marijuana as spelled out in Initiative 502.
At this point, the proposal is nothing more than an idea. And yet it brings to the forefront several crucial questions. Would this be a reasonable use of governmental power, or merely and overextension of what critics decry as a Nanny State that is becoming increasingly intrusive upon personal freedom? How far should governments be allowed to go in order to save the public from its poorer tendencies?