<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Examine plans beyond oil terminal

The Columbian
Published: April 26, 2014, 5:00pm

Technological advances have greatly increased crude production as gasoline consumption is declining, resulting in lower demand for crude and lower wellhead prices for crude, reducing profits of crude producers.

Most crude produced in America is “light sweet,” which is easier to transport and refine and priced at a premium compared to “heavy” oil that is imported. If American light sweet crude was exported, it would draw an even higher price, increasing profits for the producers, refiners and distributors and the price of gasoline at the pump, costing the consumer more.

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 prohibits the export of American-produced crude petroleum to other countries. The oil industry has not put forth any significant effort to export crude until now. The oil industry and their financiers are now working to repeal the EPCA.

I believe that a driving force behind the Tesoro-Savage plan at the Port of Vancouver is so they will be positioned to export American-produced crude. If they export crude, I’m sure they will want to increase terminal capacity, resulting in even more chances for accidents involving crude.

I do not want a crude transfer facility at Vancouver. I do not want crude transported through Vancouver.

I am strenuously opposed to transport of crude through the Columbia River Gorge.

I particularly do not want our crude ever exported.

Mike Cheatheam

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...