<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  April 24 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Editorials

In Our View: GOP Win May Benefit State

Sen. Harry Reid's power to block nuclear waste repository will be diminished

The Columbian
Published: December 3, 2014, 12:00am

Regardless of one’s political predilections, the coming Republican takeover of the U.S. Senate could prove to be a significant victory for Washington residents.

Since taking over as majority leader in 2006, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nevada, has made it a priority to block the development of a national nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain in his home state. Never mind that Congress and President Ronald Reagan agreed in 1987 to develop the Yucca Mountain site. Never mind that a Republican Congress in 2002 agreed to push forward with the plan. Never mind that the federal government has spent some $15 billion on the process. Despite all that, Reid persistently has blocked votes to bring the repository to fruition.

In that regard, Reid was doing his job in representing his constituents; the odds are that few people would want a national nuclear waste repository in their home state. But, as Washington Post columnist George Will put it, “Rather than nuclear waste being safely stored in the mountain’s 40 miles of tunnels 1,000 feet underground atop 1,000 feet of rock, more than 160 million Americans live within 75 miles of one or more of the 121 locations where 70,000 tons of waste are stored.”

Many people in Washington fall into that category, as the federal government has, for generations, ignored its obligation to clean up the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. The site, about 200 miles upstream from Vancouver along the Columbia River, is regarded as the nation’s most contaminated nuclear site and holds about 56 million gallons of radioactive waste. Hanford played a key role in the Manhattan Project and in the development of subsequent nuclear weaponry. Now, decades later, radioactive material sits within a stone’s throw of the Columbia, held there for 50 years in tanks that were designed to last 20 years. The fact that some tanks are leaking is no surprise, and yet the situation has failed to generate appropriate concern from the U.S. Department of Energy.

Most recently, state Attorney General Bob Ferguson announced plans to sue the federal government over a lack of action in protecting Hanford workers from hazardous vapors, a cause also taken up by Democratic Sens. Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray. And Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, has pushed the federal government for more transparency about the leaking tanks at Hanford.

Considering the cultural and economic role the Columbia River plays in Washington, the federal government’s decision to drag its feet on the issue has been unacceptable. And the fact that many states are facing similar questions regarding nuclear waste points out the importance of constructing a thoughtful long-term solution.

In addition, while the nation wrestles with long-range energy concerns, all efforts should be made to position nuclear power as a safe alternative to fossil fuels. Some environmentalists oppose the development of Yucca Mountain as a manner of stonewalling the development of nuclear energy; concerns over radioactive waste is one of the best arguments against such energy. In other words, they oppose Yucca Mountain as a nuclear repository because it makes sense.

For nearly a decade, Harry Reid has served as a roadblock to the development of a national repository. Now, with Republicans taking control of the Senate, Reid will find his power diminished. Meanwhile, newly elected Rep. Cresent Hardy, R-Nevada, has expressed support for the Yucca Mountain site. All of that means that the tide might turn in Congress, and that would be a victory for Washington state.

Loading...