<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Claims of safety challenged

The Columbian
Published: December 5, 2014, 12:00am

The Nov. 29 letter “Energized to open dialogue” by Jared Larrabee, general manager of Vancouver Energy, lacked facts by omission.

Stabilization of Bakken crude would make it safer to ship and store, according to Matt Rose, BNSF Railway executive chairman, and others concur. Installation of an advanced Harmful Emissions Removal System would reduce 95 percent of those emissions. In both instances, Tesoro-Savage claims both issues are too costly for their oil terminal. It appears that safety and long-term health for residents of Clark County are profit-margin based.

Larrabee spoke of Tesoro’s commitment to safety. A refinery fire in Anacortes, with seven deaths, resulted in a fine of $2.38 million for willful violations from the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, the largest in the agency’s history. Last spring, at the Tesoro Golden Eagle refinery in California, two workers received sulfuric acid burns. They had not been issued Cal/OSHA specialized protective gear. In an unprecedented situation, Tesoro refused to allow OSHA inspectors entry to that refinery for a second inspection.

One would think that if they’re the stellar image of safety, Tesoro-Savage, their legal name, would not change for their aka, Vancouver Energy, a name that has no safety record. Or maybe that is just the point.

Wilfred J. Hudson

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...