<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday, March 18, 2024
March 18, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Milbank: Disorder in the court generates headlines for attorney

By
Published:

Larry Klayman is losing again.

The conservative gadfly, who has been suing presidents for years with little success, was back in court Monday morning, this time representing Joe Arpaio, the Arizona sheriff famous for his immigration crackdowns, who wants President Obama’s immigration orders to be struck down.

Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee to the U.S. District Court in Washington, was unimpressed. Over an hour, she smiled patiently at Klayman, arched her eyebrows, squinted and shook her head at his arguments, and stared at the ceiling in exasperation.

She pronounced herself “confused” and “puzzled” by his claims. “That doesn’t cut it for me,” she told him, pointing out a “fallacy” in his case and saying, “I fail to see” the applicability of his argument. The judge further told Klayman, “You’ve got a big standing problem.” And when he tried to argue otherwise, she replied: “I really don’t find it at all persuasive. We can move on.”

Klayman faced his near-certain defeat with aplomb. He asked the judge to move “quickly” because “however you rule, it’s probably going to the Supreme Court.”

“I wouldn’t predict,” Howell said tartly. “It will make you more famous,” Klayman told her. The judge smiled. “I think in this room you’re probably the most famous.”

No doubt. How many lawsuits has Klayman filed?

“Thousands,” he said as we left the sixth-floor courtroom together. He revised downward as the elevator descended. “Over one thousand,” he amended. “Hundreds,” he said, as the elevator reached the ground.

He was being modest. Klayman sues everybody — even Judicial Watch, the litigious organization he founded. He has compiled a record my Washington Post colleague David Montgomery described as “incalculably terrible.”

A legal massacre

But winning isn’t the only thing for Klayman — or much of anything. He uses litigation as a press strategy: His lawsuits allow him to uncover documents and depose officials, which makes news and gets him headlines. “You report more when I file a lawsuit,” Klayman explained. “It’s like a prizefight.”

Among his fights: Going after the Clinton administration on “Filegate,” the Bush administration for its energy task force, and the Obama administration for its NSA eavesdropping and now its immigration policy. If Howell’s treatment of Klayman is any indication, the legal challenge to the immigration orders is going nowhere.

Klayman tried to read a long passage from an Obama speech on executive power. “I heard that speech,” Howell told him. “You don’t need to repeat the whole thing.” Instead, she began to pepper him with questions, to which he responded with a series of non sequiturs. The judge asked how Arpaio could have standing in the case if the supposed injury — death threats against him — predates the executive order. Klayman answered with a speech about how Arpaio is a “client as well as a friend.”

Howell asked how Klayman could show “irreparable harm” if he waited until now to challenge one Obama order from 2012. Klayman answered with a speech about how Obama is “not an emperor.”

She asked him about similar actions by other presidents. “I’m not sure,” the lawyer conceded. “I haven’t studied the prior ones.”

Klayman’s arguments were all over the lot, including a complaint about a $465 fee undocumented immigrants must pay to get “amnesty.” The judge’s droll response: “I take it you’re not here on behalf of undocumented immigrants?”

No, Klayman was there for himself. He spoke about his libertarian views. He recalled his days as a Justice Department lawyer. He mentioned that his brother was in the room and said, “I wish he could come up here to testify.”

Howell looked at the clock. “You have anything further?” Klayman did have another thing, and another, and another. Finally, he went silent.

“I think it went well,” Klayman said as he left the scene of his legal massacre. For his purposes, it probably did.

Loading...