<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Northwest

Local labor influence takes hit in Boeing deal

The Columbian
Published: January 4, 2014, 4:00pm

SEATTLE — Reaction was swift after Boeing machinists narrowly approved a new contract late Friday that secures the coveted 777X plane project for the Puget Sound area.

The tight count exposed deep rifts in the once-powerful union, but with plenty of states lining up to give Boeing exactly what it wanted to get work on the 777X, the aerospace giant had a tremendous advantage.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, national union leaders and Boeing all hailed the contract as a vital boost to the region’s economy.

But to some observers, the vote dealt a blow to local union influence.

“It shows that even a strong local is vulnerable and has a limited defensibility to slow the tide of concessions that has been going on across the country,” said Leon Grunberg, a sociology professor at the University of Puget Sound who co-authored a book, “Turbulence: Boeing and the State of American Workers and Managers.”

He added Saturday, “This is happening with a company that’s doing very well financially.”

Members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers approved the eight-year contract extension by 51 percent, a turnaround from November when the same workers voted down a previous offer by 67 percent.

The passing margin was about 600 votes of about 23,900 counted, said Wilson Ferguson, president of a local unit of District 751.

Ferguson said Saturday that the vote diminished the local union’s power since it conceded some hard-fought benefits they won’t be getting back.

Stay informed on what is happening in Clark County, WA and beyond for only
$9.99/mo

Foes of the contract opposed the idea of freezing the machinists’ pensions and moving workers to a defined-contribution savings plan.

“The very fact that Boeing was making these demands in the first place just has to be seen as discouraging for average workers,” said Jake Rosenfeld, a sociology professor at the University of Washington whose book “What Unions No Longer Do,” will be out soon.

“This is a very strong union, and if you have a strong union, being forced into givebacks of this sort … then you can just imagine how little leverage other workers have when negotiating,” he added.

But Richard Gritta, a finance professor at University of Portland, said Boeing needed to gain these concessions to remain competitive in the “dog-eat-dog industry” that has seen Boeing and Airbus trade dominance.

“It’s a very tough industry. To gain these concessions from labor is critical,” he said Saturday.

Local union officials had urged their 30,000 members to oppose the deal, arguing that the proposal surrendered too much at a time of company profitability. They had opposed taking a vote at all but were overruled by national leaders in the Machinists union.

A number of political leaders praised the vote, which supporters said keeps thousands of well-paying jobs in the state and solidifies Boeing’s presence in the Seattle area.

Inslee, a Democrat, said the vote secured Washington state’s “future as the aerospace capital of the world.”

More than 20 other states moved recently to bid for work on the 777X, an updated version of Boeing’s best-selling 777. Boeing has said the 777X is expected to carry as many as 400 passengers and be more fuel efficient than the 777.

Lynne Dodson, with the Washington State Labor Council, the largest labor group in the state with 450,000 members, didn’t see Friday’s vote as an indication of declining union influence. “It’s an indication of just how far Boeing will go,” she said. “It’s more a reflection of corporate greed than of union power.”

Loading...