<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Nation & World

Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley re-elected to U.S. Senate

The Columbian
Published: November 5, 2014, 12:00am
2 Photos
Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., center, with, from left, son Jonathan Merkely, wife Mary and daughter Brynne Merkely, greets supporters at the Democratic election night party in Portland on Tuesday. Merkley was re-elected to the U.S. Senate.
Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., center, with, from left, son Jonathan Merkely, wife Mary and daughter Brynne Merkely, greets supporters at the Democratic election night party in Portland on Tuesday. Merkley was re-elected to the U.S. Senate. (AP Photo/Greg Wahl-Stephens) Photo Gallery

PORTLAND — Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley was re-elected Tuesday to the U.S. Senate.

He defeated Republican Monica Wehby, a pediatric neurosurgeon from Portland.

Wehby burst onto the political scene with a compelling resume and strong fundraising. But she couldn’t recover from a series of missteps.

Old police reports showed her ex-husband and a former boyfriend both made harassment complaints against her. She also used health care and economic plans taken from other Republicans, playing into Merkley’s effort to align her with unpopular Republicans.

He echoed that theme in his victory speech, asserting that Oregonians had rejected the policies put forward by Charles and David Koch, wealthy businessmen who spent heavily on advertisements backing Wehby.

“It’s just a simple contrast,” Merkley said, pointing to differences in their approaches to tax cuts and outsourcing jobs overseas. “The Koch brothers want to restore the (George W. Bush) tax cuts. Let’s instead invest in education so our children can thrive and the next generation can thrive.”

Merkley first was elected in 2008, barely defeating an incumbent Republican with the help of new Democratic voters eager to cast ballots for Barack Obama’s presidential bid.

In his first term, Merkley became well-known among Democratic activists as a champion for progressive causes. He also has played a prominent role in efforts to crack down on Wall Street, prohibit discrimination against gays and lesbians, and end the war in Afghanistan.

He pushed for changes to Senate rules that allowed Obama to advance stalled nominations to federal courts and the executive branch.

In his re-election campaign, Merkley downplayed his progressive bona fides, playing up his working-class background as the son of a millworker-turned-mechanic. Originally from southern Oregon, he grew up in a blue-collar neighborhood of far east Portland.

With a second term, Merkley said he would fight for more changes to Senate rules, stiffer trade regulations and more transportation spending.

Conceding defeat, Wehby thanked her family and supporters, and she wished Merkley well.

“You have sent a message that it’s time to put America and Oregon back to work,” she told supporters, according to her prepared remarks. “That it’s time for our elected officials to focus on making the lives of the people they serve better.”

Merkley enjoyed support from voters of all ages, and he did especially well with women voters, according to preliminary results of an exit poll conducted for The Associated Press and the television networks.

The Democrat first elected in 2008 also was viewed as the more honest candidate.

Roughly half the voters considered Merkley honest and trustworthy, while only three in 10 said the same of his opponent. Wehby’s campaign was dogged by revelations that an ex-boyfriend accused her of stalking and that she plagiarized her health plan.

The Republican party was trying to end a 12-year losing streak in statewide races, but the poll showed about two-thirds of voters have an unfavorable view of the party. About half of those polled had a favorable view of Democrats, and nine in 10 of those voters supported Merkley.

The survey was conducted by Edison Research. A total of 959 voters who voted early or absentee were interviewed by landline or cellular telephone from Oct. 24 through Nov. 2.

Results for the full sample were subject to sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points; it is higher for subgroups

Loading...