<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Minnesota churches settle clergy abuse lawsuit

Measures put in place go beyond those previously set forth by U.S. bishops

The Columbian
Published: October 13, 2014, 5:00pm
5 Photos
Abuse survivors Al Michaud, left, and Jim Keenan embrace after they both spoke of the importance of this historic agreement as attorney Jeff Anderson, Bishop Andrew Cozzens and Vicar General Rev. Charles Lachowitzer at right look on in St. Paul, Minn., Monday, Oct. 13, 2014. A Minnesota judge signed off on a settlement in a groundbreaking case that accused Catholic church leaders in Minnesota of creating a public nuisance by failing to warn parishioners about an abusive priest.
Abuse survivors Al Michaud, left, and Jim Keenan embrace after they both spoke of the importance of this historic agreement as attorney Jeff Anderson, Bishop Andrew Cozzens and Vicar General Rev. Charles Lachowitzer at right look on in St. Paul, Minn., Monday, Oct. 13, 2014. A Minnesota judge signed off on a settlement in a groundbreaking case that accused Catholic church leaders in Minnesota of creating a public nuisance by failing to warn parishioners about an abusive priest. (AP Photo/The Star Tribune, Brian Mark Peterson) Photo Gallery

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Victims of clergy sex abuse stood next to Catholic church leaders in Minnesota on Monday to announce a settlement to a novel lawsuit that includes new measures to keep children safe.

The settlement averts a November trial of the claim that the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis and the Diocese of Winona created a public nuisance by failing to warn parishioners about an abusive priest.

“We forged a new way and that new way is an action plan — an action plan that not only protects kids in the future, but honors the pain and sorrow and grief of the survivors of the past,” victims’ attorney Jeff Anderson said.

Among the new protocols: Church leaders won’t recommend a priest for active ministry or for a position working with minors if they have been credibly accused of sexual abuse; they won’t conduct an internal investigation or “interfere in any way” with law enforcement investigations; and each clergy member will sign a declaration stating he has not abused a minor.

The measures differ from national policy set forth by U.S. bishops more than a decade ago by requiring the archdiocese to reveal the names of all abusers and documents related to their cases. They spell out in greater detail the care the archdiocese is required to provide victims, among other provisions.

However, it is unclear how the protocols could be enforced, given that they involve the internal workings of the church.

“The church is no longer our enemy in this. They are our ally,” said Al Michaud, a victim of clergy abuse. “I’m going to admit that I’m skeptical … but I hope everything I’m hearing today is true.”

The case is believed to be the first such nationwide to use the public nuisance theory. That claim allowed victims’ attorneys to seek evidence of sexual abuse across the archdiocese, rather than focus on allegations against one individual.

It forced the unprecedented disclosure of tens of thousands of church documents and the names of dozens of accused priests. The flood of information included the public release of court-ordered depositions of Archbishop John Nienstedt and other church leaders, revealing how top officials handled allegations of misconduct by priests.

Nienstedt has apologized for any mistakes but has said he won’t step down. He said he doesn’t believe he mishandled the situation.

He missed Monday’s announcement because he is on a mission trip to Kenya. In a statement, he called the protocols “a historic moment in our efforts to assure the safety of children and vulnerable adults.”

Loading...