WASHINGTON — Republicans pushed legislation toward House passage Thursday that would revoke a District of Columbia law barring discrimination against workers who have abortions, the latest clash pitting claims of religious freedom against reproductive rights.
The GOP effort was largely symbolic because the capital city’s law takes effect Saturday unless Congress first approves legislation blocking it that is also signed by President Barack Obama. The Senate is unlikely to consider the measure by then, and for good measure the White House threatened a veto should it ever reach the president’s desk.
“This legislation would give employers cover to fire employees for the personal decisions they make about birth control and their reproductive health,” the White House said in a written statement.
Thursday’s debate served as a prelude to a renewed effort likely later this year, when conservatives are expected to use budget legislation financing the city government to try blocking the local statute. Lawmakers also cast the clash as one that was larger than a dispute over one community’s ordinances.
“The goal here is to resume the war against women,” said Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Democrat who is the district’s nonvoting representative in Congress. “This bill or a version of it is pending all over the country. Stop it here or it will spread throughout the United States of America.”
Norton and other supporters said the measure would forbid companies from discriminating against employees who seek abortion, contraceptives or make other reproductive health decisions.
They argued that the GOP effort to annul the city’s law contradicted the usual Republican argument that Congress should not impose its will on local governments.
“Most Republicans cannot pass up an opportunity to meddle in personal reproductive decisions or D.C.’s right to govern itself,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass.
Opponents of the local law said it would force employers like churches, religious schools and anti-abortion organizations to violate their own religious beliefs and provide contraceptive coverage to their workers.
“I stand here to defend the rights of religious institutions and pro-life companies to honor their faith and respect the sanctity of life,” said Rep. Ann Wagner, R-Mo.
Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., said the city’s law “promotes intolerance of anyone who disagrees with the world view of the majority of the D.C. City Council.”
