<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Camden: Medical school prescription is rooted in our history

By Jim Camden
Published: March 18, 2015, 12:00am

Spend enough time listening to the debate over proposals to let Washington State University open its own medical school in Spokane, and you will hear about the big, bad university on the other side of the state having a nearly 100-year-old monopoly on doctor training.

A 1917 law is denounced as antiquated, outmoded and way too 19th century for our 21st century medical needs by folks who sometimes talk as if they were around for the vote. But it’s not exactly true that the Legislature thought deeply about medical schools 98 years ago when it passed that law. That Legislature was trying to settle a huge turf war between the University of Washington and what was then known as Washington State College, not get a med school started.

To get a feel of how bad this interscholastic fight was, one need only read news accounts of how it was settled: After spending much of the early weeks of the 1917 session lobbying for expanding programs on their campus — and taking them away from the other institution — WSC President Ernest Holland and UW President Henry Suzzallo were summoned to the governor’s office on the evening of Feb. 1, presented with a compromise weary legislators had worked out and apparently not given a chance to object.

Chances are state leaders’ patience was wearing thin. The country was in an uproar trying to figure out when, rather than if, the United States was going to war with Germany — which it would exactly two months later. Olympia, too, was more than a tad unsettled, because a disgruntled logger had shot and killed Industrial Insurance Commissioner Edward Olson earlier that day over a rejected injury claim. On Feb. 2, the House and Senate both passed the bill that divided the majors for the two schools. Unanimously.

“Collectively, the assembly heaved a sigh of relief when it was over,” J.W. Gilbert, a reporter for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, wrote the next day, calling the bill “the most notable achievement of the session.”

The university presidents held something of a news conference to answer questions and make nice in front of reporters. Gilbert described them as “felicitating each other” — which is a term that I would love to use someday if I thought I could get it past my editors.

In divvying majors, the Legislature gave law, architecture, journalism and aeronautic engineering, among others, to UW. WSC got veterinary medicine and almost anything related to agriculture and “rural life.” Both could teach liberal arts, pure science, education and several other engineering majors. The new law had a separate section requiring “work and instruction in medicine, when introduced or developed, should be taught at the University of Washington exclusively.”

Tuition $100 per quarter

The “when introduced and developed” clause is interesting now, because UW went almost 30 years before getting the go-ahead from the Legislature for a medical school. In 1945, as another world war was ending, the Legislature voted to give UW regents $450,000 for salaries to establish “forthwith” schools of medicine and dentistry, and $3.75 million for a building to house those students. For reference, the entire payroll for the university was about $6 million, so this was a substantial investment.

The Legislature set the tuition at $100 per quarter for students from Washington and the Alaska territories, and $165 per quarter for all other students. They also were assessed fees of $25 for locals and Alaskans, and $75 for all others, to help pay off the medical and dental building.

The precedent of that time gap is something WSU officials should note as the current medical school bills give them the permission to start a medical school, but not the money to do so, just as the Legislature did in 1917 for UW. But it is from that 1945 legislative action that UW’s “monopoly” on medical education grows.

It’s not a 21st century model, but unlike some descriptions of the legislative history of the monopoly, it’s more mid-20th than 19th century.

Loading...