SAN FRANCISCO — Flying over the Sierra Nevada as California entered its fourth year of drought, the state’s energy chief looked down and saw stark bare granite cloaked in dirty brown haze — not the usual pristine white peaks heaped with snow that would run the state’s hydroelectric dams for the year.
California’s historically low snowpack is a meager accumulation with serious implications not only for the state but potentially for the entire West if the drought persists.
Snowpack at 12 percent of average in the Sierra Nevada means less runoff to feed rivers and streams that run through dams to generate clean hydroelectric power. Despite the state’s ambitious clean-air goals, officials are turning to dirtier, more costly fossil-fuel plants to fill some of the gap. They also will seek hydro power imports from a region expected to have markedly less to offer this summer.
At a minimum, “we’ll keep the lights on,” said Robert Weisenmiller, chairman of the California Energy Commission. “We’re not concerned about not having power.”
“What we’re concerned about,” he said, “is, the power is going to come from different sources not as benign” for the health of people and the environment as hydro.
A study this past week by the nonprofit Pacific Institute think tank in Oakland, Calif., estimated that three years of waning hydroelectricity during California’s drought already cost utility ratepayers $1.4 billion, including purchases of power from natural-gas-fired plants.
The increased reliance on fossil fuel also caused an 8 percent rise in emissions of climate-changing carbon dioxide in California, the Pacific Institute said.
Robert Oglesby, executive director of the state energy commission, said he didn’t expect the decline of hydro power — and the boost in gas-fired power — to set back California’s goal of generating 33 percent of electricity from renewable energy by 2020. That’s because large hydroelectric dams are not officially included with solar, wind and other sources in California’s renewable energy equation.
Dams produced 12 percent of the state’s electricity in 2013. Natural gas provided 61 percent.
“For the areas of the state that have been able to rely on inexpensive hydro, and then they have to purchase more expensive energy off the grid — those costs are an impact that will be passed along over time,” Oglesby said.
Hydro is even more important for California’s northern neighbors, accounting for more than 60 percent of Washington’s power and 45 percent of Oregon’s, state officials say.
While California is 14 months into a statewide drought emergency, the governors of Washington and Oregon, where snowpack is hovering at or near record lows, recently declared drought emergencies in sections of their states.
Strong winter rain will make up for poor snow when it comes to power in Washington and Oregon, power managers there said.
“We’re not anticipating that we’re going to have any problem meeting our obligation,” said Michael Hansen, spokesman for the Bonneville Power Administration, which serves utilities in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and western Montana.
“We serve the Northwest first,” he said. “They get first dibs.”
Around the West, dam operators will be prioritizing customers, placing water for farms and cities ahead of water for power production.
Keeping drinking water running from Las Vegas to Los Angeles, and watering crops along the way, have priority over keeping the lights on, officials of the power office of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s Lower Colorado division said in email.
“We always have to point out that as important as power production may be, by law it is actually priority No. 3,” the officials said.
