<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Nation & World

Clinton: No troops in Syria, even if attack on U.S. soil

By JONATHAN LEMIRE and LISA LERER, Associated Press
Published: November 19, 2015, 12:20pm

NEW YORK — Hillary Rodham Clinton vowed Thursday to keep American troops out of Syria, saying in a sweeping foreign policy address she would resist sending forces to fight Islamic State militants even if there’s another terrorist attack within the U.S.

Offering a detailed assessment of the conflict in Syria, the Democratic presidential front-runner said America must lead the effort to fight against IS but called on Arab nations to supply much of the military force on the ground.

During a later question-and-answer session, Clinton was asked if the pressure to send in U.S. ground troops to Syria would be “unstoppable” if another terrorist attack occurred in the U.S.

“It would certainly grow, but I think it would be a mistake,” she said, noting her support for sending in more U.S. special forces, empowering U.S. trainers in Iraq and the use of an air coalition in the region. “Right now we need to keep the pressure on the people on the ground and get them to change their priorities and work together.”

Speaking just before her primary rival Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was set to address the conflict, Clinton urged Americans to overcome partisan battles and rise above personal fear to combat the threat of jihadism across the globe.

“Turning away orphans, applying a religious test, discriminating against Muslims, slamming the door on every Syrian refugee, that is just not who we are. We are better than that,” she said.

But hours later, the House ignored a veto threat from President Barack Obama and approved a Republican bill mandating fresh barriers for Syrian and Iraqi refugees trying to enter the country.

The bill passed 289-13, with enough Democratic support to override a potential veto and came despite White House officials lobbying members of their party to oppose the proposal.

While Clinton said she largely backed the president’s efforts to combat Islamic State militants, she broke with the administration’s focus on ousting Syrian President Bashar Assad — a position that’s stood in the way of greater military cooperation between the U.S. and Russia.

Clinton reiterated her support for a no-fly zone over the northern region of the country — a step opposed by Obama — saying it would help with conditions on the ground and pressure Assad to reach a political settlement in peace talks being brokered by Secretary of State John Kerry.

“Right now we have one overriding goal as I outlined: we need to crush their territorial domain,” she said. “We have to prioritize.”

She urged Turkey and Saudi Arabia to redirect their attention from battling Kurdish forces and the conflict in Yemen to the fight against Islamic State militants. And she promised that her broader approach would not lessen the pressure on Iran to comply with the recently completed nuclear deal.

Clinton also urged Congress to “swiftly” pass an updated authorization to use military force against the militants.

“This is a time for American leadership. No other country can rally the world to defeat ISIS and win the generational struggle to defeat jihadism,” she said. “The entire world must be part of this fight, but we must lead it.”

Her emphasis on American leadership marks a shift in tone from the second Democratic debate on Saturday, where Clinton said that the battle “cannot be an American fight.”

In his remarks, Sanders placed less focus on American leadership in the conflict and made no reference to whether the U.S. should accept refugees from the region.

Stay informed on what is happening in Clark County, WA and beyond for only
$9.99/mo

He took a subtle dig at Clinton, citing the invasion of Iraq — an operation Clinton backed as a senator — as destabilizing the entire region for decades.

“Wealthy and powerful Muslim nations in the region can no longer sit on the sidelines and expect the United States to do their work for them,” he said, adding that those nations should commit to fighting ISIS together, regardless of their religious and ideological differences.

Clinton’s remarks also drew a striking contrast with many of her Republican opponents who have advocated for a large-scale military mobilization, new measures to bar Syrian refugees from entering the country and a congressional declaration of war.

Former Florida governor Jeb Bush on Wednesday called for the US to “increase our presence on the ground.” Bush offered no specifics, but said the number of Americans sent to the region should be “in line with what our military generals recommend, not politicians.”

Republicans have sought to link Clinton to the unpopular foreign policy of Obama, casting her as continuing his strategy in the region. His critics have said he underestimated the threat posed by Islamic State militants, noting he once referred to the group as the “JV squad.”

“From Libya to Russia to China, Hillary Rodham Clinton has been the chief architect of the Obama administration’s failed policy of coddling adversaries, disrespecting allies and leading from behind,” said Steven Law, head of American Crossroads, a Republican political group, in a statement.

Loading...