<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Snowboarders fight resort’s ban

Utah’s Alta Ski Area wants to keep runs reserved for skiers

By KRISTEN WYATT and BRADY McCOMBS, Associated Press
Published: November 22, 2015, 5:59am

DENVER — It’s a mountain-bound battle between those who want to whoosh and those who want to shred.

A group of snowboarders argued Tuesday for the right to rip down the slopes of a Utah ski resort. Federal judges from the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver are facing an icy culture clash between the boarders and Alta Ski Area, which wants to keep its runs reserved for skiers.

The four snowboarders, who say the ban is based on incorrect stereotypes that cast them as reckless and inconsiderate, appealed after a federal judge in Utah threw out their lawsuit.

That judge said snowboarders don’t have a constitutional right to practice their sport and that allowing the lawsuit would be a slippery slope for others to claim discrimination against private companies.

Only two other U.S. resorts ban snowboarding: Deer Valley in Utah and Mad River Glen in Vermont.

The lawsuit, filed in early 2014, brought renewed attention to a feud between skiers and snowboarders that seemed to have thawed as snowboarding dipped in popularity over the last five years.

A look the issues in the case:

• “Unfair ban”: The four snowboarders and their attorneys have said that Alta does not have the right to keep snowboarders off public land designated by Congress for skiing and other sports. They point to 119 other ski resorts that operate on public land and allow snowboarding.

One of the three judges hearing the case interrupted the snowboarders’ lawyer to ask about Alta customer surveys showing that the skiers don’t want snowboarders around. The lawyer bristled.

• The blind spot: Central to the case is the snowboarders’ sideways stance, which leaves them with a blind spot. Alta claims that the blind spot gives skiers a legal reason to keep them out.

Judge Harris L. Hartz asked the snowboarders why the argument isn’t valid.

Schofield didn’t say snowboarders could prove the blind spot doesn’t exist but argued that snowboarding is safer than skiing, making the argument irrelevant.

• Equipment, not people: Lawyers for Alta Ski Area argued that they’re allowed to discriminate against equipment — just not the people using it.

Alta lawyer Rick Thaler suggested a hypothetical customer who shows up with a snowboard, a pair of skis and a snow trike, which is a sort of tricycle designed to ride down snow.

The resort said that despite the customer’s appearance, he or she would be welcome to use the mountain using the skis — just not the snowboard or snow trike.

• Backing resort: The U.S. Forest Service, which approved a permit for Alta, has backed the ski area in the court battle.

Arguing for the Forest Service, lawyer Jared Bennett pointed out that the agency has approved hundreds of permits for snow areas allowing snowboarders, making a discrimination claim flimsy.

Loading...