<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  April 20 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Smears of Clinton are inaccurate

By Charles Humble, VANCOUVER
Published: August 28, 2016, 6:00am

Typical of most Donald Trump supporters who have little positive to say about their candidate and instead resort to smears, lies and innuendos to try to undermine Hillary Clinton, Robert Kerr’s Aug. 23 letter, “Trump is the better option,” was true to form.

Clinton is one of the most hardworking, dedicated, knowledgeable and prepared candidates to seek the presidency. On the other hand, Trump is lazy, ignorant and overall the most unfit candidate ever to run. On top of that, he’s incredibly unlikable, rude and intemperate. Combine that with a hair-trigger temper and he’s exactly the opposite of what America needs in the White House.

If Kerr had bothered to do his homework, just like Trump, in fact, Democratic presidents have produced much stronger economies. Need I mention the recent George Bush economic disaster it has taken eight years to recover from?

His accusations about Chelsea Clinton are also false. She receives no — zero — compensation from the foundation for her work there. The Clintons did donate $1 million. We’ll never know what Trump has donated to charity because he’s afraid to release his tax returns.

Donald Trump — can’t trust him, not fit to lead.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...