<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Opposition rolling against oil-by-rail

By Stephen Caughlan, Vancouver
Published: February 26, 2016, 5:59am

I am writing concerning the proposed Tesoro/Savage oil-by-rail terminal construction project. I was recently visited by a representative of the Columbia Riverkeeper organization, and his information seemed as credible as it was startling.

I am concerned about the environmental impact that the proposed oil-by-rail terminal could have on the region. With an annual capacity of over 4 billion gallons of crude oil transported via 36 weekly trains measuring more than 4 miles long each, the risk or likelihood of a spill is overwhelming — that roughly calculates to a 23 percent chance of a spill every year. The odds of an actual train derailment are closer to one every other year, which is still unacceptable.

More than 100 Vancouver businesses have already allied in opposition to this terminal being constructed.

There must be a better way to create jobs and increase revenue for the area without sacrificing what we hold so close to our hearts here in the Pacific Northwest– our environment. There have been more than 276,000 public comments on the DEIS, the most ever received by Washington’s Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, echoing this message. It is clear that it has become big business vs. the local population, and we must not concede.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...