“Star Wars: The Force Awakens” has prompted plenty of writing about how putting Rey (Daisy Ridley) in the lead role shook up the way we see one of the most venerable action franchises of all time. And Forbes box-office watcher Scott Mendelson made the point that the film didn’t just lay down an artistic marker. “The Force Awakens” has made a giant pile of cold, hard cash, the kind of signal the entertainment industry is quickest to respond to.
But while money talks, I think it’s important to be cautious before declaring that Rey and “The Force Awakens” will change everything. And even if they do, “The Force Awakens” illustrates just how far Hollywood still has to go to shed the assumption that its core customers are men who only want to see men on screen.
“I’ve talked about how one big female-centric hit or another (‘Twilight,’ ‘Bridesmaids,’ ‘The Hunger Games,’ ‘Frozen,’ etc.) offered some kind of proof that female-centric mainstream popcorn entertainment was just as viable as male-centric fantasy films and male-centric comedies. And taken together, the last several years of big hits and small hits starring women and about women provide indisputable proof of the idea that targeting women is not a risky proposition and not a niche demographic sell,” Mendelson wrote.
“But now there can really be no argument. ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens,’ a female-centric mega-budget action fantasy which features a young woman in the core heroic ‘chosen one’ role, is the biggest movie of all time.”
There are a couple of caveats to that precedent, of course.
As Amanda Marcotte pointed out in Salon, putting women at the forefront of existing properties, from “The Force Awakens” to “Mad Max: Fury Road,” meant that “a lot of franchises that were feeling a little long in the tooth felt reinvigorated and fresh, reminding people of the magic that made them fans in the first place.”
That’s absolutely promising and enjoyable, but it doesn’t necessarily promise a boom in original action storytelling with women at the center. Rey is part of a tradition that includes Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) from the “Alien” franchise and Linda Hamilton as Sarah Connor in the “Terminator” movies. And while these predecessors aimed battering rams at the door that keep women marginalized in action movies, they splintered that barrier rather than smashing it decisively to pieces.
For all that Hollywood tends to be motivated by money, part of what’s interesting about the industry is the times when it diverges from cold economic logic. I’m cynical enough about Hollywood to find it entirely possible that the entertainment industry will credit anything other than Rey for the financial success of “The Force Awakens,” or at least to treat Rey as a non-entity, rather than a character to emulate.
Even if Hollywood decides that it wants more Reys in the mix, the past month is a great illustration of the many ways in which the entertainment and retail industries will have to break free of old assumptions.
Hasbro neglected to make Rey playing pieces for the “Force Awakens” edition of Monopoly, then tried to pass the choice off as an attempt to avoid spoiling the movie for fans. The character was left out of other figurine sets as well, just as companies have neglected to make toys of female characters from some of Disney’s other other franchises.
And it’s not just action movies where big companies have underestimated the demand for products tied to beloved female characters. “Frozen,” Disney’s animated musical, was much more explicitly aimed at girls and young women than “The Force Awakens” ever was, but even so, merchandise for the film sold out rapidly, leaving parents to take dramatic steps to try to track down Elsa costumes.
These sorts of omissions and shortages suggest just how strongly entertainment-industry thinking is aligned toward males. Changing what sorts of movies get green-lit, and what sorts of actors get to lead projects, is an important start.
