Scientists: Illinois’ Tully monster was a vertebrate

By

Published:

 

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — For decades, fossil hunters combing the soil near a creek in north-central Illinois have been rewarded with the preserved remnants of a prehistoric creature, its wide-set eyes on stalks and a long, arm-like appendage extending from below them with a pincher-like mouth.

There was no doubt that the Tully monster, Illinois’ official state fossil, was “very, very bizarre,” said Scott Lidgard, a paleontologist at Chicago’s Field Museum. But no one could say exactly what the soft-bodied creature was.

That changed recently with a paper published in the journal Nature: A group of researchers, Lidgard included, concluded the Tully monster had a precursor to a backbone, making it a vertebrate, or primitive fish.

The origin of vertebrates is still an open question, he said, and there aren’t many good examples of preserved, soft-bodied fishes. It’s also personally important for Lidgard, who’s long been charged with the museum’s collection of 1,800 Tully monster fossils, the largest in the world.

About 300 million years ago, the Mazon Creek area, about 50 miles southwest of downtown Chicago, was a warm coastal marsh near the equator, along a long-gone sea.

The abundant plant life eventually became coal, and eons later, strip mining dug up piles of earth and shale — and fossilized prehistoric life. Paleontologists consider the area a treasure because of plant and animal life that was, for reasons not fully known, set in stone quickly enough before decay could set in.

An amateur paleontologist named Francis Tully unearthed the first Tully monster in 1958. Thousands of other examples have since been found by fossil hunters combing the area, much of it now set aside as Mazonia-Braidwood State Fish and Wildlife Area.

The team of Tully monster researchers from the museum, Argonne National Laboratory, Yale University and elsewhere focused on some of the fossils’ curious raised areas. Those areas were once believed to be remnants of the animal’s guts, but that kind of soft tissue would have been pressed flat as it was fossilized, so these areas must have been something harder, more resilient, they thought.

“It has a cartilage skeletal system,” Lidgard said the group concluded. “It runs along the midline. Beneath it is the nerve cord … Sort of a precursor to a spine.”