<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Editorials

In Our View: Foundation for Housing

Vancouver voters’ approval of Prop. 1 begins hard work of addressing crisis

The Columbian
Published: November 13, 2016, 6:03am

Vancouver voters took a step Tuesday toward mitigating the city’s growing housing problem. And while The Columbian’s Editorial Board supported the passage of Proposition 1 on the ballot in the city, we recognize that voting is easy but governing is hard. Now comes the hard part.

Voters approved a measure that will impose a property-tax levy designated for housing assistance to low-income residents. With Vancouver having one of the nation’s lowest rental vacancy rates — which drives up costs — and with homelessness increasing, there is little doubt that something needs to be done. As The Columbian wrote editorially in support of the measure: “A community is defined by how it cares for and supports its neediest neighbors. Allowing the homeless population to grow, allowing more and more families to live in their cars, allowing more and more people to worry that the next rent increase will leave them on the streets … these are not the hallmarks of a fully developed society.”

So, we applaud voters for passing the measure with about 57 percent of the ballots; at the same time, we recognize that the next step is the most important. An advisory panel will be formed to determine how to best invest the $6 million a year expected from the tax — money earmarked for preserving and developing affordable housing and providing services such as rent assistance for low-income residents.

While many factors must be considered, the focus of the fund should be upon increasing the inventory of affordable housing. Rent assistance has benefits, but it amounts to little more than addressing the symptoms without curing the disease. The problem with housing in Vancouver — and in other cities — is that there is too little of it. And when there is too little of a commodity, the laws of supply and demand dictate that prices will rise. Providing rent assistance for low-income residents will only increase the amount of money chasing the few available apartments and homes, leading to additional price jumps.

Although some Vancouver residents would prefer to deny this fact, the city is part of the Portland metropolitan area, and it is instructive to consider growth and density in plotting the region’s future. Vancouver’s population density is significantly less than suburbs such as Beaverton and Gresham, and is slightly lower than that of Hillsboro on the outskirts of the growth boundary. There is room for growth within the city, and the city council also must be cognizant of the infrastructure improvements that are necessitated by such growth.

As noted, there are no easy solutions, and Vancouver would be wise to watch and learn from other areas facing similar issues. Bellingham approved a levy in 2012 to address affordable housing, and Portland voters overwhelmingly approved a $258 million bond Tuesday for the same purpose.

Meanwhile, we must emphasize that affordable housing is not merely an issue for the city of Vancouver; its importance extends beyond the city boundaries, and the Clark County council also must pay it some heed.

The bottom line of all this was articulated by Katie Archer, a supporter of Proposition 1: “Vancouver understands that we are in a housing crisis and that we need to do something about that as a community, because if we don’t we are not going to be living in the community we really want.”

Well said. But now comes the hard part.

Loading...