<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday, March 28, 2024
March 28, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

State: Hanford workers not protected

Case resumes Wednesday; judge to hear injunction request

By Annette Cary, Tri-City Herald
Published: October 11, 2016, 9:32pm

Kennewick — The alarm sounded as the ammonia in the air overwhelmed a hand-held monitor near a Hanford waste tank.

An industrial hygiene technician was checking the air May 2 while a Hanford instrument specialist helped calibrate instruments for a double-shell tank. Immediately, the specialist was hit with an overpowering odor.

He began coughing and his nose began to bleed steadily. He grew dizzy, his head throbbed and then he started vomiting as he headed toward a trailer where workers change in and out of protective clothing.

At least two other workers suffered similar symptoms, said the state of Washington, which recounted the incident in new documents in its lawsuit seeking better protection for Hanford workers from chemical vapors associated with waste in underground tanks.

Wednesday a federal court judge is scheduled to hear arguments in Spokane on the state’s request for a preliminary injunction requiring the Department of Energy and its contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions, to take steps to further protect workers until the case is decided.

From January through July of this year, Hanford workers reported suspicious smells or symptoms that could indicate exposure to vapors 54 times, according to court documents.

The judge also will hear arguments on DOE’s motion asking that the state’s case be dismissed. The motion does not extend to the others that have filed suit, Hanford Challenge and union Local 598.

The state blasted DOE in court documents for the federal agency’s contention that plaintiffs had not shown harm to Hanford workers from vapors.

“(DOE’s arguments) amply demonstrate the backward thinking and outright denial lying at the root of the present endangerment at Hanford,” the state said in court documents.

DOE has argued that symptoms such as headaches are common among all people and do not indicate exposure to vapors.

The state called that claim “astounding” and said it “strains credulity.”

“Defendants … summarily dismiss their own tally of worker exposures by concluding that the headaches, dizziness, bloody noses, shortness of breath and gagging — simultaneously experienced by scores of Hanford workers exposed to chemical vapors earlier this year — are mere happenstance,” the state said in a court document.

In all cases this year in which workers received medical exams for potential exposures, they were released back to work by the Hanford medical provider.

But Hanford Challenge and Local 598 said that through the years workers have been admitted to hospitals, diagnosed with debilitating lung and neurological impairment, and been unable to return to work.

DOE has no documentation of long-term effects of vapor exposures because its occupational health provider has no policy for long-term follow-up after worker exposures, Hanford Challenge and Local 598 said.

DOE said in its filings in the case that except in rare instances, vapor sampling results from monitors worn by workers near their faces show that chemicals are present at less than 10 percent of the limits set to ensure that workers were not exposed to harmful levels.

Plaintiffs questioned the effectiveness of monitoring equipment and the way DOE’s contractor calculates vapor exposure.

The court hearing is set for 9:45 a.m. in the federal courthouse at 920 West Riverside Ave., Spokane.

Loading...