Elijah Hahe spent years toiling in retail — supermarket cart boy, gas station attendant — with little to show for it but low pay, inconsistent hours and skimpy benefits. So when Hahe heard a radio ad for positions at a new Amazon.com warehouse near Columbus, Ohio, he applied immediately.”I knew Amazon was an up-and-coming company, so I figured I’d give it a shot,” says Hahe, who’s 25. “It was definitely scary. Once I got here, I realized it was a good fit.”
A year later, Hahe is training new hires and aspires to run his own warehouse. He has steady full-time work, health benefits and is saving for a three-week vacation to Ireland, something he never considered while working retail.
For many struggling store workers, the answer seems to be: If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. Amazon says it doesn’t count how many of these people it has hired. But, according to the U.S. Labor Department, the number of workers who lost their jobs at department stores such as Sears, Macy’s and J.C. Penney since 2000 is about the same as the 444,000 hired by the warehousing industry.
Many of these new warehouse jobs are at Amazon fulfillment centers, buildings of about a million square feet where products are retrieved, packed into boxes and shipped to homes around the country. The 125,000 people toiling in Amazon’s distribution network account for about 25 percent of the warehouse jobs added in the last 20 years. So while critics from Barack Obama to Donald Trump have blamed Amazon for destroying retail jobs, the online giant is also providing a potential lifeline to those same workers.
There is a wrinkle, however, with long-term implications for the U.S. labor market. The likelihood of someone who lost their job working the Macy’s makeup counter landing a job packing boxes at an Amazon warehouse largely depends on where they live (or their ability to move).
Bloomberg reviewed Labor Department data, state notices about store closures and Amazon warehouse announcements over the past 20 years, revealing a concentration of warehouse employment growth clustered around Amazon facilities while retail’s losses are more evenly distributed.
As shoppers shift more of their spending from stores to websites, some warehouse labor markets are winning while many retail markets are losing. The 1,000-plus people who have lost retail jobs over the last decade in the Columbus region where Hahe works, have Amazon as a backstop. As do retail workers in San Bernardino, Calif., Harrisburg, Penn. and dozens of other markets around the country where Amazon has set up distribution hubs.
But many regions losing department stores can’t take advantage of Amazon’s hiring machine. For example, hundreds of displaced retail workers in El Paso, Texas, are out of luck because there’s no Amazon facility nearby.
“Previously, you needed stores in big towns, medium towns and small towns,” said Kirthi Kalyanam, director of the Retail Management Institute at Santa Clara University. “With e-commerce, jobs are more aggregated. Some markets will have a huge shortage of jobs. For people caught on the wrong side, this is going to be painful.”
The e-commerce revolution that has decimated the retail industry (Toys “R” Us Inc. just filed for bankruptcy protection) is also upending the gender balance. Women hold about 60 percent of jobs at general merchandise stores but only about a third of those at warehouses, which tend to favor mid-career men without college degrees, says Jed Kolko, the chief economist at job search website Indeed.com. “The rise of e-commerce doesn’t just favor some places over others,” he says. “It favors some people over others.”
Amazon’s growing impact on the economy-including its $13.7 billion purchase of Whole Foods Market-has prompted talk in Washington that the company is growing too big and powerful. Trump frequently hints in tweets he’ll try to rein in the e-commerce giant, and Democrats have called for hearings.
No one expects an antitrust investigation against Amazon any time soon, but the company’s public relations machine has been loudly touting its hiring and job-training programs. In January, Chief Executive Officer Jeff Bezos pledged to create 100,000 jobs over the next 18 months. And earlier this month, the company invited cities to submit proposals to host a second North American headquarters that would eventually employ 50,000 (although some of those could transfer from its Seattle base).
The company is also hiring in an industry that typically pays better. Amazon doesn’t disclose pay but warehouse workers earn an average of $17 an hour versus $13 for retail workers at stores selling general merchandise. Plus, warehouse workers get more than 40 hours per week compared with about 30 for retail workers, according to Labor Dept. data.
Amazon’s job creation narrative got a boost in March when the Progressive Policy Institute concluded that the e-commerce industry is adding jobs more quickly than the retail sector is losing them. But the company remains vulnerable to criticism that it’s distribution model means jobs are concentrated in fewer pockets around the country.
El Paso has lost hundreds of retail jobs this year as Macy’s, Sears and other retailers shutter stores. Guadalupe Meyer, 51, watched the death of a local Macy’s first-hand. As she and her colleagues sold off the last of the inventory, they discussed the fate of the only industry they knew.
“We’d talk about how everything is going to Amazon and asked ourselves how we could get jobs there,” says Meyer, who has been applying at other retailers and hotels.
But Amazon’s nearest warehouse is more than 400 miles away in Phoenix. The situation in El Paso is so bleak that a local nonprofit petitioned the federal government for Trade Adjustment Assistance, long-term unemployment benefits and education funds for displaced workers.