<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Northwest

School-funding fight goes on as session nears

Lawmakers split on how, if to speed up McCleary action

By Walker Orenstein, The News Tribune
Published: January 4, 2018, 8:23pm

Headed into the 2018 legislative session, lawmakers remain divided on paying roughly $1 billion to meet a court order requiring Washington to speed up a fix for its public school system.

Top Republican and Democratic officials debated Thursday at the Associated Press Legislative Preview in Olympia over whether to use state reserves to pay the sum, use new taxes to raise the cash or to ignore the state Supreme Court altogether.

Many Democrats have argued the state should meet the court order and do so with either new taxes or a wide array of budget reserves. Democrats have narrow majorities in both chambers of government and hold the governor’s office heading into the 60-day session that begins Monday. Republicans have cautioned against raiding reserves, and some suggested disregarding the court.

“We have the cash in our pocket to do this,” Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee said. “It’s in our pocket, it’s not like we’re broke.”

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, who spoke before Inslee, appeared lukewarm on the governor’s specific proposal to pay for the education costs with reserves and later refill the state’s wallet with a tax on carbon polluters. The nature of that carbon-tax plan is expected to be released next week.

The K-12 money is the latest — and potentially final — task remaining from the state Supreme Court’s landmark 2012 education case known as McCleary. The court said in its initial ruling the state was not fully funding the school system as required by the constitution.

Since then, lawmakers have poured billions into public schools and enacted major reforms. One of those reforms came in 2017, when the Legislature approved a complicated property tax shift to take on the full cost of teacher and other school staff salaries that in recent years have been paid in part by local property taxes.

The shift, thought to be the last piece of McCleary, is supposed to inject $7.3 billion in new state spending on K-12 schools over four years.

At the same time, the schools plan limits how much money districts can raise through their local levies and says the money can’t be used to pay for basic education costs, such as teacher salaries.

In 2017, the court deemed the state’s reforms worthy, but said the changes did not take effect fast enough to meet a Sept. 1, 2018 deadline.

The schools plan — and the new state property tax lawmakers used for it — are phased in, meaning most of the complex changes are fully implemented in the 2019-2020 school year.

Support for levy swap

Republicans on Thursday made the case the so-called levy swap was designed to introduce the complicated changes to school funding over time to avoid burdening school districts.

Morning Briefing Newsletter envelope icon
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.

Sen. John Braun, a Republican from Centralia, said that plan shouldn’t be sped up simply to meet a court order one year faster. Doing so could end up causing problems for some districts, Braun said. Braun, who was the chief budget writer in the state Senate last year, said the state instead should focus on improving special education and other areas education advocates say need help following the 2017 school reforms.

“I think that our plan is good. The court has said it’s good. They’ve certified the plan. They just don’t like the timing,” he said. “I just think we did the timing for a reason. We shouldn’t undo the timing carte blanche.”

Braun said he wasn’t in favor of using protected reserve funds, which he said should be saved in case of economic downturn. He also said the state doesn’t need new taxes to pay for McCleary and could use hundreds of millions in increased revenue that recent budget projections have shown is flowing into state coffers.

Inslee’s plan uses a mix of unrestricted reserves and money from the rainy day fund, which typically requires approval from 60 percent of the Legislature.

Democrats weren’t ready to test the court — which could hit the state with sanctions — by ignoring the McCleary order. The state already is being held in contempt of court for its lack of progress on McCleary, with the court imposing fines of $100,000 per day.

Democrats also did not immediately jump aboard Inslee’s supplemental budget plan to use reserves and refill the state’s funds with a carbon tax.

Loading...