The Columbia River Crossing

Subscribe

Bridge Graphic

The Big Divide

Tease photo

The Big Divide, Day 2: How Clark County really feels about CRC

Gov. Jay Inslee's recent visit to Vancouver sent a clear message that Clark County's views about the Columbia River Crossing are an important part of the regional debate over the $3.4 billion plan to replace the Interstate 5 bridge with a new highway and light rail structure. As the shouting is rising on both sides of the debate, the governor told local supporers to get louder.

Tease photo

The Big Divide, Day 2: The Poll results

Clark County residents are deeply divided on the Columbia River Crossing, with neither supporters nor opponents claiming a clear majority of public opinion, according to a scientific poll commissioned by The Columbian this month.

Tease photo

The Big Divide: Competing political wills block the way

Clark County's political and business leaders who've steered the county's growth strategy for decades are under fire by critics girding to capsize their priorities. Most business and civic groups, as well as local governments, see a new Interstate 5 bridge as a main ingredient of Clark County's future prosperity. But their critics aim to sink the proposed CRC, in part because the $3.4 billion Interstate 5 Bridge replacement project will bring light rail into Clark County. If they're successful, CRC opponents will tear into the very fabric of the leadership elite's sense of what the county needs to thrive.

News

Tease photo

CRC close to second mitigation agreement

The Columbia River Crossing appears close to a mitigation agreement with two of the three major river manufacturers affected by the project, after Greenberry Industrial announced Monday that it was nearing a deal.

Maintenance to cause delays on I-5 Bridge

A series of maintenance lifts will cause delays on the northbound side of the Interstate 5 Bridge late Thursday and early Friday, according to the Oregon Department of Transportation.

Tease photo

C-Tran board grills top CRC officials

Its role in project unclear, agency seeks answers on points of dispute

As it evaluates its role in the Columbia River Crossing project, the C-Tran Board of Directors on Tuesday walked through a series of disputed questions in a meeting with top project officials.

Car fire near I-5 Bridge clogs southbound traffic

A car fire reported on Interstate 5 southbound, just north of the bridge, clogged traffic.

Tease photo

CRC close to mitigation deal with Oregon Iron Works

Company would be negatively impacted by a lower I-5 bridge over the Columbia River

Oregon Iron Works, one of the companies that would be negatively impacted by the Columbia River Crossing project, is close to reaching a mitigation deal with the CRC, Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee said this week.

Washington megaprojects study, including CRC, could cost $475,000

SEATTLE — The state of Washington could pay as much as $475,000 for an outside study of three Transportation Department megaprojects — the Highway 520 floating bridge on Lake Washington, the Highway 99 tunnel under downtown Seattle, and an Interstate 5 bridge across the Columbia River.

Tease photo

C-Tran prepares a special CRC meeting

List of 93 questions will begin the discussion of bridge, light-rail funding

The C-Tran Board of Directors will meet face-to-face Tuesday with Columbia River Crossing officials as the transit agency approaches a major decision point on its role in the controversial megaproject.

Tease photo

CRC foes, supporters step up lobbying efforts

Lawmakers open special session Monday

As legislators face a decision on whether to commit $450 million this year toward the Columbia River Crossing project, lobbying and advertising efforts have increased ahead of a special legislative session that begins today.

Tease photo

Gov. Inslee declines request for another CRC review

He says project has been inspected enough, another review would waste tax money

The Columbia River Crossing project does not need another investigation, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee wrote recently in a letter to conservative leadership in the state Senate.

Tease photo

Coast Guard seeking comment on CRC

The U.S. Coast Guard is still months away from making a decision that could make or break the Columbia River Crossing. But the Coast Guard on Tuesday formally kicked off the comment period inviting the public to speak directly to the agency that essentially holds veto power over the project.

Previous

  • CRC Expenses

A set of documents provided by the Columbia River Crossing with reports, expenditures, etc.

History

  • 1917
    1917 - The original bridge

    On Feb. 14, a headline in the Vancouver Daily Columbian heralds the opening of a new bridge across the Columbia River at Vancouver: “With iron bands we clasp hands,” replacing ferry service in place since 1870. Plans for the bridge took root in 1905, when the world’s fair in Portland caused massive traffic jams of people waiting for the steam ferry. The bridge, which cost $941,000, opened with a toll of 5 cents. The tolls generated money for repaying construction bonds, but about half the revenue was used to improve public roads elsewhere. The toll ended in 1928. The original span carries northbound traffic on what is today Interstate 5.

  • 1958
    1958 - A worker on the new bridge

    The second span, a twin to the first drawbridge, opens on July 1 at a cost of $14.5 million. Original span taken out of service until January of 1960 while workers replace one portion of the span and raise it by 30 feet to match the “hump” in the new bridge, which allows more boats to pass without having to block auto traffic for bridge lifts. Both bridges reopen in 1960 with a toll of 20 cents for cars and 60 cents for trucks. Toll ends on Nov. 1, 1966.

  • 1982
    1982 - I-205 Bridge Construction

    The federal government underwrites the bulk of the $175 million cost of the toll-free Glenn Jackson Bridge, which opens after five years of construction on Dec. 15, 1982. Washington’s portion of I-205, just under 10 miles, opened in 1976. The bridge opening corresponds to Oregon finishing its 36-mile stretch of the beltway looping around the east side of the Portland metro area.

  • 1999
    1999 - Bridge traffic

    Growing traffic congestion prompts Washington and Oregon transportation agencies to examine I-5 trade corridor from the freeway’s interchange with Interstate 84 in Portland to I-205 in Salmon Creek. Study concludes that highway, transit, freight and passenger rail improvements will be needed to maintain the region’s economic competitiveness. The most economically significant portion of the corridor straddles the Columbia River, where the bulk of the metro area’s industrial land base and shipping centers are clustered. In 2002, a bistate task force prioritizes fixing three bottlenecks in the corridor: Expanding I-5 to three lanes through Salmon Creek (finished in 2006); fixing Delta Park bottleneck in Portland (finished in 2010); and improving I-5 at the river.

  • 2008
    2008 - I-5 Bridge Transport

    A new 39-member bistate task force narrows potential improvements to variations of a supplemental or replacement bridge with light rail or a bus rapid transit system. In late June and July, six project sponsors conditionally endorse a “locally preferred alternative” consisting of a replacement bridge with an extension of Portland’s light rail transit system. Local sponsors include the Vancouver and Portland city councils, the Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council, the Metro regional government in the Portland area, C-Tran and TriMet.

  • 2010
    2010 - Bridge Rally

    Criticism mounts over details of design, funding and scope of $3.6 billion project. Govs. Chris Gregoire and Ted Kulongoski respond by appointing an independent review team, followed by a Bridge Expert Review Panel to address specific concerns about the 10-lane river crossing’s cost, durability and “underwhelming” appearance from Vancouver’s revitalizing downtown.

us on Facebook for the latest news and information from Clark County
on Twitter for the latest news and information from Clark County