Artimus, so you liked my last bridge post. Funny how that article is still frozen at 7:35 am on the 18th of June...and they have it as "Editor's Choice." Luckily, there's a new one in the editorials...and I'm just getting started!
I did not want to post on the main page for this...I did buy a "Motion Sensory Camera System", and have a friend who is good with electronics coming to install it for me this weekend. I feel my family is in danger, and will now be leaving Beau in the garage during the day while I am at work so that one of these crazy "Breed Haters" doesnt come here and hurt him. I am terrified for his safety, and that of my children right now.
Artimus. No need to argue. Many times a 'quiet' call can get cancelled. Many times there is an issue that you need to come in almost code, but not code. Believe me all departments, both public and private have very strict rules regarding this type of stuff. I do know it can look like what you perceive, as a supervisor I had to investigate such complaints from customers and it was usually a canceled call and the medics were hungry already and stopped for food. Dude, it is dangerous to be flashing emergency lights about 10% of people freak and do stupid stupid stuff. Again, what you state is an assumption/opinion. Surely there are the bad apples, especially on the police forces, but don't clump in medics please, many of them work for private companies and get paid poorly for some very important work.
The "proof" you said didn't exist about the illegal activity at The Value Motel last year seems to have finally made the paper in this morning's article about the wide spread drug and prostitution issues with the hotel.
Thank you for suggesting that the letters to the editor be broken up and no longer lumped together as a group. I made note of that, but before I even had time to talk to someone, Lou was on it. He talked to someone, and the change went into effect with yesterday's letters.
Thanks for pointing that out to us. I definitely think it was for the best and appreciate that you took the time to you suggest it.
When you bring some evidence that supports your claims, we can continue that thread. But like the last time (http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/ap... ), you'll probably seem to stop when it's shown you have nothing but denier talking points.
Here's some science. Now, explain why your unsupported contentions trump real data:
Take the observed data, the science, and show us why you think whatever you think is true.
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an observable link by isotope to our burning of fossil fuels and the rise in CO2. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/outreach...
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an logical reason accept the work of thousands of scientists in a wide range of disciplines that show all those changes.
Lew...do you really have to do this? It's no coincidence that "artie" parrots your diatribe to the letter. Are you really that insecure with the issues at your age not to have one voice?
If you would like to know more about my daughter's case I would be happy to talk to you.. my number is 503-853-9597
txcowboy — June 11, 2010 at 5:01 p.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
Artimus, so you liked my last bridge post. Funny how that article is still frozen at 7:35 am on the 18th of June...and they have it as "Editor's Choice." Luckily, there's a new one in the editorials...and I'm just getting started!
goldenoldie — June 18, 2010 at 7:35 a.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
You have no right saying that about the tribe. You do not know what they have been through. So how dare you say that
casandrareeves — August 27, 2010 at 11:55 p.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
I did not want to post on the main page for this...I did buy a "Motion Sensory Camera System", and have a friend who is good with electronics coming to install it for me this weekend. I feel my family is in danger, and will now be leaving Beau in the garage during the day while I am at work so that one of these crazy "Breed Haters" doesnt come here and hurt him. I am terrified for his safety, and that of my children right now.
theotherside — October 21, 2010 at 7:09 p.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
Artimus. No need to argue. Many times a 'quiet' call can get cancelled. Many times there is an issue that you need to come in almost code, but not code. Believe me all departments, both public and private have very strict rules regarding this type of stuff. I do know it can look like what you perceive, as a supervisor I had to investigate such complaints from customers and it was usually a canceled call and the medics were hungry already and stopped for food. Dude, it is dangerous to be flashing emergency lights about 10% of people freak and do stupid stupid stuff.
Again, what you state is an assumption/opinion. Surely there are the bad apples, especially on the police forces, but don't clump in medics please, many of them work for private companies and get paid poorly for some very important work.
jack28 — December 28, 2010 at 4:22 a.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
The "proof" you said didn't exist about the illegal activity at The Value Motel last year seems to have finally made the paper in this morning's article about the wide spread drug and prostitution issues with the hotel.
heather_z — February 9, 2011 at 10:06 p.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
Do you know for a fact that LED lights and helium balloons caused the UFO?
ufohelper — February 22, 2011 at 6:58 a.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
Thank you for suggesting that the letters to the editor be broken up and no longer lumped together as a group. I made note of that, but before I even had time to talk to someone, Lou was on it. He talked to someone, and the change went into effect with yesterday's letters.
Thanks for pointing that out to us. I definitely think it was for the best and appreciate that you took the time to you suggest it.
Matt
Matt Wastradowski (Columbian Staff) — March 24, 2011 at 12:31 p.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
you really need to find a more accurate source of information, yours is skewed by a severe right hand limp
ronnieraygun — April 1, 2011 at 8:12 a.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
artimus — May 3, 2011 at 10:25 a.m
artimus — May 2, 2011 at 10:55 p.m
artimus — May 2, 2011 at 10:22 a.m
And a dozen previous times......
You missed it:
For more on the human fingerprint on Climate Change:
2009 State of the Climate
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2...
CO2: Control Knob
http://www.agu.org/meetings/fm09/lect...
When you bring some evidence that supports your claims, we can continue that thread. But like the last time (http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/ap... ), you'll probably seem to stop when it's shown you have nothing but denier talking points.
Here's some science. Now, explain why your unsupported contentions trump real data:
Take the observed data, the science, and show us why you think whatever you think is true.
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an observable rise in temperature. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators/
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an observable link by isotope to our burning of fossil fuels and the rise in CO2. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/outreach...
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an observable rise in ocean acidity and temp. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/11030...
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an observable migration of species and diseases to accommodate the rise in temp.
http://awarmerplanet.com/2009/05/two-...
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an logical reason accept the work of thousands of scientists in a wide range of disciplines that show all those changes.
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_d...
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an logical reason to make efforts to reduce our CO2 emissions.
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_d...
Explain why, in your opinion, there isn't an logical reason to continue the mitigation efforts that are going on world wide.
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_d...
For more on the human fingerprint on Climate Change:
2009 State of the Climate
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2...
http://www.agu.org/meetings/fm09/lect...
mr_basil_seal — May 3, 2011 at 10:50 a.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )
Lew...do you really have to do this? It's no coincidence that "artie" parrots your diatribe to the letter. Are you really that insecure with the issues at your age not to have one voice?
nailingit — May 16, 2011 at 8:50 a.m. ( reply | permalink | suggest removal )