You need to stop reading and trying to regurgitate propaganda, Lew is a NeoCon. Democrats are closer to the "tea party" philosophy than Lew. If you are going to use derogatory terms and try to insult an entire group, you should at least take a few minutes and try to understand what they stand for.
I don't know who's top ten "free" list you are reading but since the EU came out that freedom of speech is not a fundamental right, I have a hard time believing we are not at the top of the list.
Exigent circumstances is house specific, never has the Supreme Court upheld it unless the police see a fleeing suspect entering a specific house or heard screams from a specific house. The Watertown searches is new territory. I don't know how the Court would rule in this specific case because there is no precedent. As far as shooting the police officer, I would suggest you read Bad Elk v United States.
House to house searches by definition lack probable cause. All precedent to date require location specific exigent circumstances. The Watertown searches have broken new ground in crushing the fourth amendment.
Who is wrong? The Fourth Amendment answers that for us.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Couple that with John Bad Elk v. U.S. which reaffirms the right of innocent citizens to respond to deadly force from police with deadly force, if they do not have a warrant.
Open forum, April 22-28
luvithere — April 28, 2013 at 6:35 a.m
Also the "Westboro Idiots" are democrats, can you provide any credible proof that they are not, I can provide plenty that they are.
April 28, 2013 at 9 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
luvithere — April 28, 2013 at 6:35 a.m.
Lew supports a interventionist foreign policy and a larger more intrusive government, that is NeoCon philosophy.
April 28, 2013 at 8:52 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
mrd — April 27, 2013 at 9:19 p.m.
You need to stop reading and trying to regurgitate propaganda, Lew is a NeoCon. Democrats are closer to the "tea party" philosophy than Lew. If you are going to use derogatory terms and try to insult an entire group, you should at least take a few minutes and try to understand what they stand for.
April 28, 2013 at 5:29 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
I'm not generally a big fan of country music, but they lost one of their greats today
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R2F9f...
April 26, 2013 at 8:34 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
mrd — April 25, 2013 at 9:38 p.m.
I don't know who's top ten "free" list you are reading but since the EU came out that freedom of speech is not a fundamental right, I have a hard time believing we are not at the top of the list.
April 25, 2013 at 9:56 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
hawkeye — April 25, 2013 at 9:35 p.m.
You're becoming a bad joke.
Time for the block user button.
April 25, 2013 at 9:48 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
Drift — April 25, 2013 at 9:04 p.m.
Exigent circumstances is house specific, never has the Supreme Court upheld it unless the police see a fleeing suspect entering a specific house or heard screams from a specific house. The Watertown searches is new territory. I don't know how the Court would rule in this specific case because there is no precedent. As far as shooting the police officer, I would suggest you read Bad Elk v United States.
April 25, 2013 at 9:20 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
nailingit — April 25, 2013 at 6:40 p.m.
House to house searches by definition lack probable cause. All precedent to date require location specific exigent circumstances. The Watertown searches have broken new ground in crushing the fourth amendment.
April 25, 2013 at 7:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
Drift — April 25, 2013 at 1:39 p.m.
Who is wrong? The Fourth Amendment answers that for us.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Couple that with John Bad Elk v. U.S. which reaffirms the right of innocent citizens to respond to deadly force from police with deadly force, if they do not have a warrant.
April 25, 2013 at 5:46 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Open forum, April 22-28
nailingit — April 24, 2013 at 9:25 p.m.
"I have to agree with Dubya luvit, George & Laura improved the human condition by a zillion percent on January 20-2009."
Your statement could have been true, if Obama had proved to be better in any way, but he is just more of the same.
April 24, 2013 at 10:19 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )