insii

Comment history

Letter: Time to re-examine priorities

It's not what you do when people are looking, it's what you do when you think no one is looking that counts.

May 29, 2011 at 6:54 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Oppose reducing sentences

Isn't the point that offenders, sexual or otherwise were getting some manner of "get out of prison without supervision free card"? The bill in the link I posted doesn't even do that and the link you posted only "cleans up the language" as is often the case citizen. The LTTE pushes a panic button that's unnecessary.

May 28, 2011 at 11:48 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Default on debt cannot be allowed

Then answer the question I asked you. Is the quote inaccurate?

May 28, 2011 at 11:02 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Concern over access for all dissent

I've decided to join the 21st century and leave tomorrow behind. Adois suckers.

May 28, 2011 at 9:47 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Default on debt cannot be allowed

I see we've discovered a new tactic along with the inauguration of a new member to the conservative brain trust. All I can say is keep up the "good work" it'll take every one of you to actually come up with an "original" thought though. That or you could just do as Lew Waters and pluck them directly from the "Rules for Radicals".

May 28, 2011 at 2:23 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Default on debt cannot be allowed

KNDali2012 your desperation gives off the stench of desperation.

May 27, 2011 at 10:19 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Default on debt cannot be allowed

Is the quote inaccurate KNDali? Since Allen attributes the quote I don't see the relevance in revealing the direct source.

May 27, 2011 at 1:47 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Default on debt cannot be allowed

East_County your comments on the LTTE don't disprove the "canard" however your admission of advocacy for austerity does belie your own assertions.

May 27, 2011 at 1:39 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Vancouver Voice newspaper up for sale

Hear me out. WW, a weekly with, I think we can all agree, a decidedly liberal slant, buy's VV and publishes it from a conservative perspective. There are things about the business models that aren't parallel, WW is a well established, culturally oriented, juggernaut, in comparison but putting that aside there has to be a few good conservatives willing to take up the challenge. They wouldn't necessarily be in direct competition per se, they would be alternatives to one another. Or I keep hearing how Clark county is such a bastion of conservatism, it seems to me an excellent opportunity for some manner of conservative consortium to actually put their money where their mouths are and invest in their own community.

May 27, 2011 at 10:24 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Default on debt cannot be allowed

Not unlike "The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008" it's a huge fecal sandwich and everybody has to take a bite. The government started lending/printing the money to stabilize the banks, unfreeze the credit markets and to prevent a run on the banks. Since assuming those "troubled assets" the debt of the government was significantly increased there by exacerbating the issue of the debt ceiling. You want "TO BIG TO FAIL" you got it. The U.S. is roughly a quarter to the worlds economy. Defaulting is not an option, politicizing it is treason.

May 27, 2011 at 10 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Previous