If I-735 gets enough signatures, the Legislature will be asked to pass a law supporting the change and urging the congressional delegation to propose an amendment. If the Legislature balks, Washington voters would get a chance to weigh in next November.
None of that guarantees the amendment would get through Congress and back to the states. A national group, known as the Wolf PAC, wants to force campaign finance change through the other mechanism to amend the constitution: A convention.
This liberal populist group shares very little in common with the American Legislative Exchange Council, a business-backed conservative group that wants a balanced budget amendment. But they both want a constitutional convention for something they suspect Congress won’t do on its own.
Such a convention can happen if two-thirds of the states call for one on a particular issue. ALEC is far ahead in the quest to get the necessary 34 states; 27 Legislatures have passed a resolution calling for a convention to enact the balanced budget amendment, while only four have approved a proposal on campaign finance changes.
Washington will be target
Washington is among 13 states being targeted next year in an effort to get a convention for the balanced budget amendment. If seven of those states jump in, Article V of the Constitution kicks in and there would be a convention.
If five or six states send the request, Congress might take up the amendment on its own. That happened in the early 1900s when the states wanted the people to elect their U.S. senators but members of the Senate, in what can only be described as unenlightened self-interest, refused until the nation approached the two-thirds threshold and they were forced to read the writing on the wall.
The prospect of a constitutional convention worries people of various leanings. Common Cause supports campaign finance reform and opposes the balanced budget amendment, but is very much against a constitutional convention to enact either. Senior writer/Editor Dale Eisman says nobody can predict how such a convention would be established, who could attend or what would come of it.
“Once you get started, it’s Katie bar the door,” Eisman said.
There’s no real precedent. Except, of course, back in 1787, when the nation called a convention to tweak the Articles of Confederation, and wound up scrapping them entirely for the Constitution.
