Loss of tourists for the recreation industry to smoky skies. Yep.
Higher bacteria in the shellfish beds from warmer ocean water. Apparently.
High mortality of salmon in the rivers from the heat. OK, but some environmental groups will argue the Snake River dams factor into that.
Then there was this: “The people who filmed the vampire show, ‘Twilight’, the reason they filmed it in Forks is they said they wanted to go to the rainiest city in America. But last week in Forks, they had water restrictions,” he said.
At least for the part about filming “Twilight” in Forks. The town has had water restrictions, and there were even wildfires in the Olympic rainforest for much of the summer, so it is drier than normal there.
The first “Twilight” movie was filmed primarily in Oregon and British Columbia. A few exteriors were shot in Kalama, but nothing was actually shot in Forks or La Push, even though the books by Stephenie Meyer are set there. Later movies were shot in British Columbia, Italy and Brazil.
The town of Forks has attempted to turn the books and movies into a tourist industry, but its selection as a setting is purely chance. Any teen girl fan of all things “Twilight” would know that Meyer said she picked Forks because an atlas listed it as the rainiest place in the United States, and the cloudy, rainy weather meant her vampire characters could avoid the fatal sun’s rays and be out and about more. Meyer, who lives in Arizona, had never actually been to Forks when she wrote the books.
Spin Control is not written by teen “Twilight” fans. But anyone who sat through debates over extending the state tax preferences for making movies and TV shows in Washington heard the lament that “Twilight” was not shot in Forks because the state is not competitive in the deals it offers film companies.
Inslee apparently confused the raison d’etre for the book setting with film production.
Eyman under fire
Initiative impresario Tim Eyman is trying to avoid questions about his past campaign activities as he tries to plug his latest ballot measure.
In a recent interview with The Seattle Times Editorial Board, Eyman — who is scheduled to meet with The Columbian’s Editorial Board on Friday — refused to answer any questions about the Public Disclosure Commission investigation into an alleged money shuffle among Eyman, a signature-gathering company, and an out-of-state initiative support group. They could ask, he said, but he’d only talk about Initiative 1366, this year’s attempt to force the Legislature into approving tax increases with a two-thirds supermajority.
He also reportedly canceled a scheduled televised debate with the representative of a progressive group that opposes I-1366 on Seattle’s KING-TV.
This reticence has not slowed Eyman’s emails to supporters that talk about I-1366 and double as an effort to raise more money from what he labels as his “thousands of supporters throughout the state.”