Camden: New list aims to improve Washington’s ranking on other lists

The index is a list, or more accurately an amalgamation of other lists to create a super list. So super is the index that where most rankings go from 0 to 100, this goes from 0 to 150, the better to cram and crunch all the calculations needed to blend 10 variables in three categories to come up with an “Opportunity Score” for all 50 states. Sorry District of Columbia, no Opportunity Score for you.

A middling 24th

Washington’s Opportunity Score is — drum roll please — 79. That puts Washington at a middling 24th place, just a smidge below Idaho, but a full four points above Texas, which is in 25th. In other words, good for you Famous Potatoes, but take that, Longhorns.

Since no one had heard of the Opportunity Score before early this month, this takes some ‘splaining.

The score involves three areas, education, which it calls Achieve; transportation, which it calls Connect; and economics, or Employ. Those three form the acronym ACE , which is reminiscent of WashACE, the predecessor of Washington Opportunity.

In the eyes of these business groups, Washington ranks 18 out of the 50 states on education based on measurements it selected. Good on 4th-grade reading and 8th-grade math scores, below average on high school graduation rates and producing college graduates with bachelor and advanced degrees.

It ranks 23 out of 50 on economic factors, with good research and development investment and a good supply of entrepreneurs, but higher than average business costs. And of course they figured in high unemployment insurance rates into those costs, as one would expect from a couple of business groups.

Where it falls down most is in transportation, at 38 of 50, with long commute times, and roads and bridges that need repair. That could change if there’s a new index in a couple of years, because this one doesn’t take into account the new higher gasoline tax, some of which will be used to fix crumbling roads and bridges. It’s also fair to note the commute time is really bad in the Puget Sound area, and getting worse, so the rest of the state is sort of tarred with that.

So what does all this mean, other than there’s a new list to feed the insatiable appetite of the Internet?

Steve Mullin of the Washington Roundtable hopes it serves as a baseline against which future improvements can be measured, and “where we must concentrate efforts to make Washington a Top 10 state.”

That would seem to be the ultimate in our list-making culture: creating a list that serves as impetus for doing better on the list.